Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Chairman Elrond.

Expand Messages
  • Merlin DeTardo
    Message 1 of 108 , Sep 2, 2007
      ---David Bratman <dbratman@...> wrote:
      << So far as I know, Shippey is the only scholar to maintain that
      Tolkien's Council of Elrond is a badly-chaired committee meeting. What
      on earth is he talking about? Yes, it's long, but that's because it's
      really more a conference than a meeting. And it's a very logically
      organized conference. It begins with background papers by the chairman
      and Messrs. B. Baggins and G. Mithrandir, among others, followed by a
      fairly brief (8 pages out of 41 in the abridged transcript, Ballantine
      ed.) discussion session that's very much to the point of the decision
      that has to be made, and it's concluded by a final action statement ("I
      will take the Ring"). Jackson's version of the meeting is the one
      that's badly-chaired, with all that squabbling that doesn't exist in
      Tolkien. >>

      Shippey's explanation appears in _J.R.R. Tolkien: Author of the
      Century_ (pp. 77-82 of the Houghton Mifflin paperback edition). He

      "If the Council were a well-organized committee meeting of modern time,
      it would have on its agenda only three items:
      (1) to determine whether Frodo's ring is indeed the One Ring, the
      Ruling Ring
      (2) if it is, to decide what action should be taken
      (3) and further, who should take it."

      He goes on to observe that the first issue could be quickly settled by
      Gandalf, who can match Isildur's words to the inscription on the Ring.
      That doesn't happen for quite some time (the timetable to which I
      previously linked estimates 2 hours, 23 minutes). So Shippey asks, "Is
      Elrond simply a poor committee chairman?" And then he traces the
      course of the meeting to that point, concluding with this comment: "The
      tale has not in fact been told 'from first to last' at all, but through
      a series of interjections, as one character or another manages to turn
      the conversation to their immediate concerns."

      Of course, Shippey recognizes that Tolkien presents the Council with "a
      good deal of art", and with other purposes than merely showing a well-
      organized meeting. In the essay you mentioned, "Another Road to Middle-
      earth", Shippey seems to feel that these purposes are satisfied in the
      film: the history of the Ring from the book's Council is moved
      elsewhere in the film, the book's flashback structure regarding
      Gandalf's imprisonment is presented directly, etc. leaving a tighter
      focus on the one crucial point of the Council: Frodo's decision -- "I
      will take the Ring".

      -Merlin DeTardo
    • aveeris523@aol.com
      ... appropriate. ************************************** Check out AOL s list of 2007 s hottest products.
      Message 108 of 108 , Dec 7, 2007
        In a message dated 12/7/07 9:41:39 AM, dbratman@... writes:

        > Very much the opposite opinion here. I don't recall anything harmful being
        > done to the text, but the image was definitely a problem. Tolkien says she was
        > "beautiful beyond enduring, terrible and worshipful." The only word in this
        > that Jackson seems to have followed was "terrible" - and he seems to be using
        > it in the sense of "scary and terrifying," rather than "eliciting awe" which
        > is what Tolkien presumably meant.
        > Good point David! Beautiful and Terrible like an angel would have been more

        Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest


        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.