Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [mythsoc] Beowulf film

Expand Messages
  • David Bratman
    ... I have e-mails from you referring to my misguided rants and wild ravings : those are exact quotes from you. You didn t use the actual word rabid , but
    Message 1 of 108 , Sep 2, 2007
      At 10:39 PM 8/29/2007 -0500, Mike Foster wrote:

      >David, I don't think I've ever accused you of being "rabidly

      I have e-mails from you referring to my "misguided rants" and "wild
      ravings": those are exact quotes from you. You didn't use the actual word
      "rabid", but that seems a close enough paraphrase of what you did say. Of
      course, what prompted these outbursts from you were close analyses of
      Jackson, which for some reason is more than some people seem to be able to
      handle. And they've never been purely anti-Jackson. I once told you I
      consider it my bounden duty to point it out to you every time I say
      something positive about Jackson for the next three years, and it hasn't
      been three years yet.

      >I do share Tom Shippey's view that the films, despite
      >their many flaws, have brought many new readers to the book. Some of
      >them were college students of mine and some of them turned out to be
      >rather good undergraduate scholars. Is that bad?

      Mike, Mike, Mike, Mike: we already went over this the last time this
      subject came up, and my response to that argument is, once again, contained
      in the very post to which you are replying! I wrote:

      "Tom Shippey expressed rather lukewarm feelings in his essay on the
      subject, hoping mostly that the films will lead readers to the book. (Which
      they have. But that doesn't make the films good. Ralph Bakshi led readers
      to the book. Rankin-Bass led readers to the book. Even Leonard Nimoy
      singing 'The Ballad of Bilbo Baggins' led readers to the book.)"
    • aveeris523@aol.com
      ... appropriate. ************************************** Check out AOL s list of 2007 s hottest products.
      Message 108 of 108 , Dec 7, 2007
        In a message dated 12/7/07 9:41:39 AM, dbratman@... writes:

        > Very much the opposite opinion here. I don't recall anything harmful being
        > done to the text, but the image was definitely a problem. Tolkien says she was
        > "beautiful beyond enduring, terrible and worshipful." The only word in this
        > that Jackson seems to have followed was "terrible" - and he seems to be using
        > it in the sense of "scary and terrifying," rather than "eliciting awe" which
        > is what Tolkien presumably meant.
        > Good point David! Beautiful and Terrible like an angel would have been more

        Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest


        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.