Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

More about the Wilson biography of Lewis

Expand Messages
  • WendellWag@aol.com
    I d like to explain a little more carefully why I think that the Wilson biography is inadequate. When one reviews it, it s hard to not come across as a
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 31, 2007
      I'd like to explain a little more carefully why I think that the Wilson
      biography is inadequate. When one reviews it, it's hard to not come across as a
      nitpicker who ignores the larger conclusions of the book. Wilson is an
      extremely good writer. Indeed, he's probably the person with the greatest
      literary reputation who has written about Lewis. It's easy to get the impression in
      reading the book that he's spent a lot of time thinking about Lewis and that
      this is the sum of a lifetime's research into Lewis.

      In fact, it's clear that Wilson was working very fast when he researched and
      wrote the book. Wilson is what's sometimes called a "quick study" (i.e.,
      someone who can research a large subject and summarize it very quickly). I
      think this is partly because he comes out of a British academic tradition in
      which this ability is highly valued. When you spend your undergraduate career
      writing an essay every week for your tutor which is supposed to be both
      well-written and moderately insightful, you learn to be able to do this sort of
      quick research and writing.

      The point of showing how many little factual errors Wilson made is to show
      just how fast he was working. Given how little time he had to write this
      book, in comparison with the largeness of the subject, one should hesitate about
      accepting the larger conclusions that Wilson makes about Lewis. Some of
      those conclusions are reasonable and a fairly good analysis of Lewis, considering
      how little time Wilson spent on the book. Some of them are just way off
      though, in my opinion.

      I almost want to say that I wish that Wilson had spent more time on this
      book, doing more research and thinking more closely about Lewis. The problem is
      though that apparently that's just not how Wilson works. He doesn't think
      of himself as a subject matter expert who writes the definitive book on a
      topic. He thinks of himself as someone who writes popular books about (more or
      less) literary topics that sell well mostly because he has fans who buy all of
      his books. To spend the time to write a better book about Lewis would be to
      give up the career Wilson has chosen.

      I don't know how someone could write the definitive biography of Lewis that
      really needs to be written. Compared to how much the book could possibly
      make, it's hard to see how someone could afford to spend the time that the book
      would require. Really though, we don't need any more acceptable but
      superficial biographies of Lewis. We need the definitive biography.

      Wendell Wagner

      ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.