Re: [mythsoc] Harry Potter
- Stolzi@... wrote:
> Haven't seen the second. PRISONER OF AZKABAN, no. 3, does perhaps justifyAs far as the Slytherin students go, I can't help thinking of
> the criticism that Rowling is getting too dark - with the "Dementors" and the
> descriptions of butchery etc. If the witches are the good guys, what are
> they doing employing Dementors, eh? and if they want to run a =good= school,
> why is everyone nasty and rotten both a) accepted and b) placed in Slytherin?
> To justify this, you'd have to give forth a philosophic riff about the
> necessity of "balance" and of "accepting the Dark Side" - a philosophy I
> don't accept and certainly wouldn't purvey to children.
Edmund's comment in VOYAGE OF THE DAWN TREADER: "If there's a
wasp in the room, I like to be able to see it." In other words,
if you =know= this unsavory element exists in the wizarding
community (which is not all that different from the rest of
humanity), perhaps it's better to have them under your eye, where
you can keep track of them and perhaps exert some control over
them. After all, the likely alternative would be the
Slytherin-types slinking off and founding their =own= school.
Think of that and tremble! :)
- From: "Stolzi" <Stolzi@...>
> http://www.comics.com/comics/nancy/archive/nancy-20050817.htmlWow, I didn't know they were still publishing Nancy! I see they've updated
the look of her aunt's but not Nancy herself. I guess it would be like
Blondie and Dagwood getting different hairstyles. They're all prisoners of