Re: [mythsoc] Sam, was:: O.W.L.'s in Harry Potter (spoiler at end)
- At 01:27 AM 8/3/2005 +0000, Joan Marie Verba wrote:
>Having read both yours and David B's comments on this issue (and INot contradictory, Joan. Sam did make the best choice he could: then later
>have read David B's response to this), I have to say I'm inclined to
>agree with you, Grace. It's easy to see all the options after the
>fact, but at the time, I think Sam made the best choice he could.
he changed his mind and decided it had been wrong. Then he got further
information (Frodo isn't dead - I'm sorry, is that a spoiler?) and decided
he had been wronger still.
But it's because he makes the best choice available to him at the time that
the following turns out to be true:
>(I do agree, however, with David B's later comment that It All TurnedI only brought this up in the first place to point out the difference in
>Out Right In The End For A Reason, even if Sam's choice at the time
>was admittedly awkward and admittedly he had other options, and may
>have even thought of other options if circumstances had been
dynamic between Sam leaving Frodo and Harry feeding Dumbledore birdwater.
There's no right or wrong here, they're just very different stories of
heroes in extrema.
- ONe tidbit I didn't see mentioned in the various takes on the theory: at the end Harry rather considers "getting Snape" as a possible by-product, but isn't overly concerned with Snape or Malfoy. One could counter that he is focused on Voldemort, but I'm not sure I buy that as just putting Snape out of mind.
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 8 at http://www.opera.com
Powered by Outblaze