Re: [mythsoc] loyalty oath
- View SourceIt does here. Says right there on the rules tucked under the "Unwelcome
Elizabeth Apgar Triano
amor vincit omnia
> [Original Message]branch--fanzines, languages--need to call a newer one not "valid"?
> From: Mike Foster <mafoster@...>
> To: <email@example.com>
> Date: 3/2/2005 4:31:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [mythsoc] loyalty oath
> John's exact words,
> their own
> > branch of Tolkien scholarship that in time will probably turn out to
> > be just as valid as the one that grew out of fanzines.
> suggest a new branch growing on the great tree of Tolkien. Does one
- View Source-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Foster [mailto:mafoster@...]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [mythsoc] loyalty oath
>From here in the sweet shires of farm country in Middle-Illinois, I canTwo answers:
>attest to you that both the care of kine and the making of butter and
>especially cheese is rather like, uh, work. And if Bombadil and
>Goldberry are Ab-Original and Unfallen, why would they work?
1. Goldberry (at least) did work. She had a washing-day while the
hobbits were there.
2. The Lord labored six days.