Re: [mythsoc] Digest Number 1740
- View SourceEverybody, I seem to be having significant difficulties extracting my
feet from my mouth at the moment.
Authorial intent was not what reader interpretation suggests. :-(((
- View SourceAt 12:58 PM 12/2/2004 -0600, steve wrote:
>Authorial intent was not what reader interpretation suggests. :-(((If it wasn't, author desperately needs an elementary remedial course in
expressing his intent. Hint: crude insults and low-blow parodic names for
states of the union will not win you friends or influence people there.
- View Source
>Frankly, I didn't feel the urge to scroll down, given the first couple ofOops ... I'm sorry about that ... I was indeed referring to the
>posts I saw. I'll hear about this little anecdote some other time I
comment that came below. It was so long that when I was finished
reading it I forgot about what was at that the top. I didn't mean to
offend anyone and I have no affiliation with that website, it was just
what I happened to read. Here are some better links. I think this is a
story with two different, very strong viewpoints, so in the interest
of fairness, I have posted first the Reuters story reporting on the
banning of the Declaration of Independence which contains the
teacher's side of the story, and the second is a website that tries to
get the school's side of the story, reporting on the strong (or
exclusive) religious content of the lesson plan, parent complaints
about this teacher, etc.
Anyway, I guess I should stop with this now, since I'm not being
mytheopeic at all.
I am finding the freenmasonry discussion fascinating, but haven't
anything to add, as I am not knowledgable in that area.