31Re: 1998 Fantasy Books
- Dec 7, 1998On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, David Lenander wrote:
> Has any other current fantasy genre writer been more consistently good?At times I think we should just make McKillip the default winner. <g>
Seriously, though, I've put a bit of thought into this whole McKillip
thing because my wife is *not* a McKillip fan. I started reading The Book
of Atrix Wolfe to her and she stopped me after about three chapters. We
made it through Forgotten Beasts of Eld and I thought it was wonderful and
she thought it was "OK". I think McKillip is so enjoyable to me because of
<cliche warning> the wonderful lyricalness of her writing. She and Beagle
both use the cliches of the genre, but make those cliches seem new and
beautiful -- like that cereal commercial, "discovering them again for the
very first time."
As to consistent authors, Crowley gets better in my eyes, but he is just
right on the edge of fantasy -- especially with the Aegypt tetralogy. I
could see nominating Little, Big were I in the Society back then. (Sorry,
I'm only 28, so I was, um, 12 when it came out), but even though I think
the Aegypt tetralogy is excellent, it'll probably never get nominated by
> Pam Dean's Rosemary & Juniper book won't make my final list, though I enjoyedCould you elaborate on what you liked about it? I made it through, but my
> reading it.
feelings were in line with what Berni felt -- Dean's representation of
adolescents was waaaay to unreal to be believable at all. It worked in Tam
Lin (barely), but not here.
Matthew Winslow mwinslow@...
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading
them." - Joseph Brodsky
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>