20779Re: [mythsoc] Congrats and phrasing
- Aug 16, 2009You are not the only one, David. Certainly not. I see pictures in my
brain; it is with effort that I ignore them or eradicate them. Even
something as basically innocuous as the film of "The Deep End of the
Ocean" means I see those actors now when I think of the book. I have
now given myself permission to refuse to see films based on books I
love. I saw Jackson's orc show, which I hated and continue to hate
with the burning fury of a thousand white hot suns, out of a sense of
intellectual necessity. (If I intend to argue something, I must know
exactly what I'm arguing about.) But that's it. No Narnia for me, no
Jane Austen, no future Hobbit projects, nothing that takes something I
adored in a book and makes it into a film -- I am free to ignore them.
Incidently, my whiplash experience was at about age 10, when I saw the
Gene Wilder-starring version of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." I
was enraged and thought that surely such hacksawing of a story HAD to
be against the law. Sadly, it isn't. But come the revolution...
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:01 AM, David Bratman<dbratman@...> wrote:
> Sue Bridgwater <suebridgwater@...> wrote:
>>I will simply agree that of course turning to a book from a film
>>or tv adaptation can often be the 'reading trigger'.
> It can. It seems only fair to point out, however, that it can also be the
> As a child, I saw the films "Mary Poppins" and "Oliver!" Enthused by both, I
> sought out the books by Travers and Dickens on which they were based. In
> each case, the books were so different that I got a case of mental whiplash
> so severe I've never gotten over it, and have never gotten to like either
> author. I feel fortunate that I read Jane Austen, for instance, before the
> 1990s rash of Austen adaptations, which give a quite misleading impression
> of her tone.
> Knowing my own likes and dislikes in fantasy, I can say confidently that if
> I had never read "The Lord of the Rings" and went to see the Jackson films,
> and was assured by credentialed Tolkien experts that they faithfully
> captured the spirit of the book - a few Tolkien experts actually maintain
> this untenable position, falsely claiming that they represent the consensus
> of Tolkien scholarship which they emphatically do not - I would never have
> bothered to read the book, because if the book were like the films it would
> have no appeal to me. And the major literary experience of my life would
> have been denied me.
> Critics are free to claim that I am an utterly unique individual and this
> scenario could never have happened to anybody else. But they don't know
> that, and we never will know, because if there is anybody like me having
> that experience, we'll never know it, because they aren't reading Tolkien.
> And since the argument is on the same lines as the one actually postulated,
> that I am the only person in the world who can't get a film out of my head
> when re-reading the book it's based on, it's almost certainly as nonsensical
> as that one was.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>