20209Capitalization in Tolkien
- Dec 5, 2008Hi,
I've been banging my head against this one for a while, and would appreciate any advice...
Should one capitalise fantasy races?
Now the obvious answer would seem to be no, no more than we capitalise real species. So fox, rabbit, hobbit, elf.
But Tolkien frequently - and frequently inconsistently, so far as I can see - does capitalise. Not so much in the Hobbit, sometimes in LotR and his letters, always in CoH (making it Christopher I suppose, but he should know!). Shippey doesn't capitalise, other writers do. Some people claim that the inconsistency is due to Tolkien's editors and proofreaders not being up to the task, but this doesn't seem to excuse the Letters (or does it?). It would be nice to say that Tolkien used lower case if referring to the species (a noun: 'the elven race is immortal', or 'an elven sword'), and capitalised if referring to a specific individual or group of individuals (a proper noun: 'Bilbo the Hobbit', or 'the Hobbits in the boat'. But this doesn't seem to be the case, certainly not by CoH.
Online, some people advocate always capitalising fantasy races (saying that they are really more a people), others advocate never capitalising. Most seem unsure.
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 5.7 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 149793 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len
The Professional version does not have this message
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Next post in topic >>