19342Re: [mythsoc] Mystical Realms . . .
- Jan 9, 2008On Jan 9, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Carl F. Hostetter wrote:
> Do you really think _that_ is either CSL's or Aquinas's claim? (I.e.,I'm afraid I've never read Lewis's essay ("Why I Am Not a Pacifist'),
> that "Jesus didn't really know what he was talking about"?) Or could
> it perhaps be that CSL and Aquinas don't think that what is right and
> admirable when chosen as a personal response to personal threat, is
> either right or admirable when it comes to defending _others_ from
> threats? (Which, you know, is pretty much the _purpose_ of
> government.) In other words, do you think Jesus enjoins us not to
> defend others? If so, do you think that Jesus meant that governments
> should not defend their citizens?
though I'm now going to search out a copy so I can read his argument
for myself. I've also not read Aquinas, and don't know where within
his voluminous works he discusses this topic, nor the details of how
he reaches his conclusion.
With that caveat, it's right and admirable to defend others from
harm (especially by offering yourself in place of another). I am
dubious that this is 'the purpose of government' (i.e., that
governments arose from such benign and altruistic motives). The
example of Peter, who is rebuked for meeting violence with violence
in order to protect an innocent man from torture and death, seems
pretty emphatic that, so far as the gospel is concerned, there is no
'good violence'. Obviously, the majority of Christians have disagreed
with this interpretation, so Lewis is firmly in the majority here.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>