17134Re: [mythsoc] Unfact #2 (follow up)
- Nov 2 9:17 PMFair enough.
To put it simply, as a detailed account it's a hopeless mess; as
a general overview, it's well-written and you could do far worse
(alas). I leave to each reader to supply the appropriate adjectives
he or she sees fit.
On Nov 2, 2006, at 1:24 PM, David Emerson wrote:
>> In short, a worthy effort fatally marred by her inability to get
>> inessential detail right.
> This may be picking nits, but since the erroneous details are
> "inessential", does this really make it "fatally" flawed? Perhaps
> the flaw is merely crippling but not death-inducing?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>