17003Re: [mythsoc] Paul Park
- Sep 25, 2006-----Original Message-----
Sent: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [mythsoc] Paul Park
At 02:03 PM 9/24/2006 -0500, David Emerson wrote:
>His setting up our world to be an invention of the other world wasWasn't it? Most fictional worlds that (within the fiction) are "more real"
>definitely not a cliche.
than ours seem to feel distinctly less real. Actually, most fictional
worlds seem less real than ours, but when the author uses this set-up it
really brings it out. E.R. Eddison almost got away with it in "A Fish
Dinner in Memison", purely by stylization, but Roger Zelazny certainly
didn't with Amber. How would you measure Park's achievement against those?
It's hard to measure, because the two worlds (one being essentially modeled on the other, with a few
tactical changes) are so intimately entwined that a lot of things we take for granted feel like they can
be assumed about the other world as well, until the plot surprises us by showing us otherwise.
_A Fish Dinner in Memison_ is actually a pretty good parallel, although there's no resemblance between
The Mythopoeic Society website http://www.mythsoc.org
Yahoo! Groups Links
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>