11726Silmarillion - HoME II
- Mar 11, 2004
> >JH: We never finished our conversations about this, especially regardingJH: Yes, indeed. This was the genesis of my original question to Mr.
> >how CT's edition of the Silmarillion is somehow different in
> "weight" than
> >the HoME.
> DB: Weight for what purpose? For some purposes it weighs more, for
> others less.
Pearce. How should we view the Silmarillion? Pearce believes that Tolkien
was a perfectionist. Hence the Silmarillion was not finished when he died.
But unlike some literary figures, he never consigned unpublished manuscripts
to the flames or the river. He was, as many elderly folks are, a sort of
"pack rat" and kept everything. Perhaps he continued to refer to the early
manuscripts for ideas, refreshment of memory, etc. Had he lived long enough
to the complete the Silmarillion in a form that satisfied his perfectionist
tendencies, Perhaps the HoME might have taken a different shape through CT
after JRRT's death. Then it might be a clearer case of weightiness or not.
As you previously pointed out, CT was faced with putting the narrative in a
publishable form and made choices. Then he edited and published the whole
lot of his father's papers and manuscripts for others to compare. This is a
fabulous treasure trove! Thank goodness he did this. But I am still left
with the question that I originally posed that Pearce did not answer,
because we got side-tracked with dinner. How is CT's edition of the
Silmarillion different than the HoME? He compiled and edited the final
versions, best versions, most clear versions, or whatever, of the
mythologies as they existed at the time of JRRT's death, and produced "The
Silmarillion." Is the S a distillation of the manuscripts and papers that
make up the HoME? If so, then why would we regard the S as being more
authentic than the manuscripts of the HoME?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>