Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

New York Review of Books on H.P. Lovecraft (Luc Sante, "The Heroic Nerd")

Expand Messages
  • T. Peter Park
    THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS October 19, 2006 Volume 53, Number 16 Review The Heroic Nerd By Luc Sante Tales by H.P.
    Message 1 of 3 , Oct 2, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS

      October 19, 2006


      Volume 53, Number 16
      <http://www.nybooks.com/contents/20061019>


      Review


      The Heroic Nerd


      By Luc Sante

      Tales

      by H.P. Lovecraft, edited by Peter Straub

      Library of America, 838 pp., $35.00

      H.P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life


      by Michel Houellebecq, translated from the French by Dorna
      Khazeni, with an introduction by Stephen King

      Believer Books, 245 pp., $18.00 (paper)

      That the work of H.P. Lovecraft has been selected for the Library of
      America would have surprised Edmund Wilson, whose idea the Library was.
      In a 1945 review he dismissed Lovecraft's stories as "hackwork," with a
      sneer at the magazines for which they were written, Weird Talesand
      Amazing Stories, "where...they ought to have been left."[1]
      <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fn1> Lovecraft had been dead for
      eight years by then, and although his memory was kept alive by a cult--
      there is no other word--that established a publishing house for the
      express purpose of collecting his work, his reputation was strictly
      marginal and did not seem likely to expand.

      Since then, though, for a writer who depended entirely on the meager
      sustenance of the pulps and whose brief career brought him sometimes to
      the brink of actual starvation, whose work did not appear in book form
      during his lifetime (apart from two slender volumes, each of a single
      story, published by fans) and did not attract the attention of serious
      critics before his death in 1937, Lovecraft has had quite an afterlife.
      His influence has been far-reaching and, in the last thirty or forty
      years, continually on the increase, if often in extraliterary ways.
      Board games, computer games, and role-playing games have been inspired
      by his work; the archive at hplovecraft.com includes an apparently
      endless list of pop songs--not all of them death metal --that quote or
      refer to his tales; and there have been around fifty film and television
      adaptations, although hardly any of these have been more than
      superficially related to their sources.

      There is a reason for that superficiality. Lovecraft's work is
      essentially unfilmable, not because his special effects are too gaudy or
      too expensive to translate to the screen, but because they are purely
      literary. Lovecraft was bookish in an extreme, almost parodistic way. He
      may not have worn a fez or been able to afford a wing chair, but he
      assumed the archetype of the nineteenth-century man of letters (Wilson
      calls him "a literary man manqué") with his circle of disciples, the
      roughly 100,000 letters he wrote to them (and he was only forty-seven
      when he died), the preciously archaic language in which he expressed
      himself (almost always using "shew" in preference to "show," for
      instance), the humid cultivation of in-jokes that migrated from the
      correspondence to the stories and were perpetuated in stories by the
      disciples, and the carefully tended aura, if quite self-aware, of
      "forbidden knowledge."

      In other words, he was a nerd. He was a nerd on a grand scale, though--
      a heroic nerd, a pallid, translucent, Mallarméan nerd, a nerd who
      suffered for his art. His art consisted exclusively of conveying horror,
      and in this his range was encyclopedic. As a setting for his horror he
      built a whole world--a whole universe, with a time-span measured in
      eons--which others could happily continue furnishing indefinitely. His
      horrors themselves are, with a few unhappy exceptions, described loosely
      and suggestively enough that in effect they present a blank screen on
      which the reader can pro-ject whatever visual imagery is most personally
      unsettling. This explains the seeming paradox of an exceedingly bookish
      writer enjoying a legacy that is to a very large degree extraliterary.
      As a supplier of instruments for the cultivation of horror he was
      custom-tailored for the suggestible fourteen-year-old boy, and the
      number of fourteen-year-old boys--some of them chronologically rather
      older, a few of them even female--is continually on the increase.

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Howard Phillips Lovecraft was born in Providence, Rhode Island, in 1890,
      the neglected, lonely child of a father who died of tertiary syphilis
      after years of institutional confinement and a mother who was by all
      accounts confused and immature. Growing up in his maternal grandfather's
      house, Lovecraft was left to his own devices. The foundations of his
      imaginative world were laid very early; he suffered the first of many
      emotional crises (a "near-breakdown") at age eight. His formal schooling
      was sporadic thereafter, but he voraciously engaged in self-teaching,
      particularly in astronomy. He published several hectographed journals of
      astronomy in his early teens, and in his later teens and twenties wrote
      an astronomy column for a number of Rhode Island newspapers. He began
      writing stories and poems in his late twenties, publishing them
      initially in amateur showcases.

      One of the advantages of Peter Straub's fine selection for the Library
      of America volume--which represents a bit over half of Lovecraft's
      fiction--is that when read in sequence it allows the reader to watch him
      maturing as a writer. The main thing I remembered from reading Lovecraft
      when I was fourteen was his prodigal expenditure of a certain kind of
      deckle-edged Gothic vocabulary: noisome, ichor, eldritch, miasmal,
      necrophagous, eidolon. It turns out that this sort of usage drops off
      significantly after the first few stories (although he could never quite
      shake blasphemous, unhallowed, or Cyclopean). The early stories are
      flagrant pulp, which is to say that they are crudely executed goulashes
      of literary effects from all across the nineteenth century. That was the
      era when more was more, and it gave him license to unleash sentences
      that cannot now be read aloud straight-faced: "Shall I say that the
      voice was deep; hollow; gelatinous; remote; unearthly; inhuman;
      disembodied?" Or: "In that shrieking the inmost soul of human fear and
      agony clawed hopelessly and insanely at the ebony gates of oblivion."
      Sometimes it is impossible not to imagine an accompanying illustration
      by Edward Gorey: "Wretched is he who looks back upon lone hours in vast
      and dismal chambers with brown hangings and maddening rows of antique
      books, or upon awed watches in twilight groves of grotesque, gigantic,
      and vine-encumbered trees that silently wave twisted branches far aloft."

      Lovecraft was an authority on the tradition of horror fiction; even
      Edmund Wilson concedes that his long essay "Supernatural Horror in
      Literature" (1927) is "a really able piece of work." Besides Poe, to
      whom he was permanently in debt, he admired above all Arthur Machen and
      Lord Dunsany, who have steadily become less read and less readable since
      their heyday in the early twentieth century, and it may be from them
      that he absorbed various Symbolist and Decadent tendencies (he mentions
      Baudelaire a couple of times in ways that leave doubt whether he had
      actually read him). He also drew upon the Puritans, with emphasis on
      their more sensational effusions (between his extraordinary last name
      and his long, bony, thin-lipped face it isn't hard to imagine Lovecraft
      himself as a witch-trial judge), and had clearly delved deep into
      certain strains of Americana.

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------

      He marshaled this equipment in the service of a single goal: horror. He
      was apparently not much interested in anything else. He could summon up
      considerable book learning when it would serve to buttress a story, but
      did not waste time on fripperies such as characterization, the business
      of daily life, or any emotions other than fear.[2]
      <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fn2> The complete absence of even
      suggested sexuality in his work was much debated by fans in the
      Freud-shadowed mid-twentieth century; the proposition, rather missing
      the point, that he might have been homosexual sparked ferocious
      arguments. Although he was married briefly, and many years later his
      former wife was moved to state, peculiarly, that he was an "adequately
      excellent lover," it is clear from all available evidence that
      sexuality, procreation, and the human body itself were among the things
      that scared him the most.

      He was also frightened of invertebrates, marine life in general,
      temperatures below freezing, fat people, people of other races,
      race-mixing, slums, percussion instruments, caves, cellars, old age,
      great expanses of time, monumental architecture, non-Euclidean geometry,
      deserts, oceans, rats, dogs, the New England countryside, New York City,
      fungi and molds, viscous substances, medical experiments, dreams,
      brittle textures, gelatinous textures, the color gray, plant life of
      diverse sorts, memory lapses, old books, heredity, mists, gases,
      whistling, whispering--the things that did not frighten him would
      probably make a shorter list. He evidently took pleasure in his fears,
      at least those on the creepy-crawly end of the spectrum, and although he
      really did suffer from his fear of cold, for example, this did not
      prevent him from exploiting that fear in a couple of stories, one of
      them ("At the Mountains of Madness") his best.

      The things that did not scare him are generally absent from his work.
      Often his stories take place in a continuous landscape of fear, in which
      every detail contributes oppressively. In "The Lurking Fear," for
      example, all of nature is malevolent: "I hated the mocking moon, the
      hypocritical plain, the festering mountain.... Everything seemed to me
      tainted with a loathsome contagion, and inspired by a noxious alliance
      with distorted hidden powers." The story concerns a Dutch family in the
      Hudson River Valley that, determined to resist the encroachment of the
      English in the late seventeenth century, shuts itself away from the
      world; 250 years later inbreeding has caused the stock to degenerate to
      a species of anthropophagous subterranean ape. Although this seems
      excessively silly, it arises from authentic American folk panic--the
      fear of isolated backwoods tribes with strange customs and perhaps
      genetic deformities--which in Lovecraft's day was accorded a certain
      respectability by the pseudoscience of eugenics.

      Lovecraft lived in Brooklyn for two years in his mid-thirties, during
      his marriage. While he was initially awestruck by New York City, his
      attitude changed radically, at least in part because of the personal
      unhappiness that resulted from his inability to find work. Like many
      others unnerved by the chasm between the grandeur of their genetic
      inheritance and the squalor of their prospects, he blamed the
      immigrants. New York City, once a wonder of "incredible peaks and
      pyramids rising flower-like and delicate from pools of violet mist to
      play with the flaming golden clouds and the first stars of evening,"
      became a "tangle of material and spiritual putrescence [from which] the
      blasphemies of an hundred dialects assail the sky." What those "swarthy,
      sin-pitted faces" were up to he addressed directly in "The Horror at Red
      Hook": the immigrants (many of them, apparently, Kurds) are devil
      worshipers who, led by the degenerate scion of an old Dutch family,
      engage in ritual murder and child sacrifice in addition to the usual
      menu of rum-running and alien-smuggling.[3]
      <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fn3> It did not really take
      unemployment in the Big Onion to awaken Lovecraft's fear of the other,
      though. Some years earlier, in "Herbert West--Reanimator," he had given
      a description of a Negro boxer, the least offensive part of which
      concerns his face, which "conjured up thoughts of unspeakable Congo
      secrets and tom-tom poundings under an eerie moon."

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Lovecraft's racial and eugenic preoccupations, which were hardly unusual
      for his time, formed a constituent element of his landscape of horror
      since, as he wrote in 1930 to his friend Robert E. Howard, creator of
      Conan the Barbarian, "The basis of all true cosmic horror is always
      violation of the order of nature." But Lovecraft was already looking
      beyond the mere caprices of earthly existence, seeking vaster, more
      awesome horrors. In "Supernatural Horror in Literature" he had written:

      The one test of the really weird is simply this--whether or not
      there be excited in the reader a profound sense of dread, and of
      contact with unknown spheres and powers; a subtle attitude of awed
      listening, as if for the beating of black wings or the scratching of
      outside shapes and entities on the known universe's utmost rim.[4]
      <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fn4>

      In 1926, at the same time that he was drafting his essay, he wrote "The
      Call of Cthulhu," which was to be the first installment of his life's
      work, the Cthulhu Mythos, a sort of unified-field theory of horror.

      In the story, the figure of Cthulhu--an otherworldly being so terrible
      that it can never be seen directly, but is manifested by various
      attributes--first appears in a dream experienced by several people
      simultaneously, during a minor earth tremor. There are suggestions of
      Cyclopean architecture, indecipherable hieroglyphics, and "a voice that
      was not a voice" intoning something that can only be transcribed as
      "Cthulhu fhtagn." Soon it develops that police in Louisiana,
      investigating reports of a voodoo cult in the swamps, had come upon an
      "indescribable horde of human abnormality" conducting a bizarre ritual
      around an eight-foot granite monolith. In custody, the worshipers, "of a
      very low, mixed-blooded, and mentally aberrant type," were nevertheless
      able to give an account of their creed, which centered on the Great Old
      Ones, who had come to earth from the stars long before the appearance of
      humans. Cthulhu was a high priest who lived in suspended animation in
      the great city of R'lyeh, somewhere under the ocean, waiting for the
      chance to rise again.

      After this, the Mythos began to figure in nearly every story that
      Lovecraft wrote, and it developed ramifications in every direction. In
      "The Case of Charles Dexter Ward," a long, complex tale reaching back to
      seventeenth-century Providence, it appears that the cult of Cthulhu is
      what actually underlies such heterogeneous matters as witchcraft,
      alchemy, and vampirism. Playing a prominent part is the Necronomicon, an
      ancient book, invented by Lovecraft in 1922, supposedly the work of one
      Abdul Alhazred (a name Lovecraft had devised for himself at age five,
      under the spell of the Arabian Nights), a sage whose career ended when
      he was devoured by an invisible demon in broad daylight in the
      marketplace in Damascus. The Necronomicon is ritually invoked in nearly
      every story thereafter as the key to the commerce between the Great Old
      Ones and the human race, and it is soon joined by a shelf of other
      apocryphal titles, such as the "pre-human" Pnakotic Manuscripts.

      Many of the stories take place in or around the ancient city of Arkham,
      Massachusetts--Lovecraft's version of Salem--and its Miskatonic
      University, one of the four or five places on earth where a copy of the
      "forbidden" Necronomicon is kept, under lock and key. The Cthulhu
      Mythos, which would be extended by others after Lovecraft's death, in
      ever-widening rings of diminishing returns (even the Necronomicon
      eventually achieved material form in the 1970s, more a heavy-metal
      fashion accessory than a book intended to be read), represented a way
      for Lovecraft to order his fears, to unify the realm of pure otherness,
      the source of every inexplicable human terror.

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------

      Lovecraft is at his most effective when he evokes this inhuman realm,
      just as he is at his best when he suggests, rather than attempting to
      describe. He does himself no favors by revealing, for example, that the
      beings of the Great Race are cone-shaped, of a "scaly, rugose,
      iridescent bulk...ten feet tall and ten feet wide at the base"; the
      sight may cause Lovecraft's narrator to scream hellishly, but the reader
      is more likely to picture some kind of Cyclopean jelly candy. The more
      spectral and unimaginable his subject, the more Lovecraft is at home.
      Where he fails utterly is in conveying lived experience, the material
      counterweight to his phantoms. His monsters, when exposed to the light,
      exhibit the pathos of creatures in poverty-row horror movies; his
      depictions of human life on earth in his own day are the least credible
      elements in his work. The stories "He" and "The Horror at Red Hook" make
      it sound as though he had never set foot in New York City, while "The
      Shadow Over Innsmouth" suggests that he never visited the New England
      coast and "The Dunwich Horror" and "The Whisperer in Darkness" that he
      never so much as glanced out a train window at a rural landscape. It is
      not that his settings are unreal--it is that they are made entirely of
      words. They do not provide any suggestions to the inner eye, only
      adjectives, mostly hyperbolic.

      It is of course unfair to expect a thistle to bring forth figs.
      Lovecraft only barely managed to exist on the material plane himself,
      and it certainly was not his subject. His strengths, meanwhile, were
      unusual and idiosyncratic. He had a flair for names, for instance. The
      monikers he hangs on his otherworldly manifestations--Nyarlathotep,
      Yog-Sothoth, Tsathoggua--are evocatively miscegenated constructions in
      which can be seen bits of ancient Egyptian, Arabic, Hebrew, Old Norse.
      The terror of Cthulhu is most vivid on the purely linguistic level: "Iä!
      Shub-Niggurath! The Black Goat of the Woods with a Thousand Young!" The
      New England he fashions is so tangibly haunted in its nomenclature--
      Arkham, the Miskatonic River, Devil's Hop Yard, Nooseneck Hill--that he
      would have been wise to stop there and not attempt further description.
      He savors the dark texture of seventeenth-century Puritan names: Obed,
      Peleg, Deliverance, Elkanah, Dutee. He frequently engaged his schoolboy
      correspondents to send him lists of regional names from their local
      phone books. Names, real and imagined, accomplish nearly everything his
      strangled fustian tries and fails to do: suggesting vast stretches of
      time, experience far outside the modern frame of reference, the
      subterranean course of genetic inheritance, the repression of dismal
      ancestral proclivities.

      It is possible to view Lovecraft's work as an expression of the mingled
      fascination and revulsion he felt for his Puritan heritage. Like the
      Bible, the Necronomicon is an ancient work, steeped in mystery and
      filled with horrors, that describes the compact imposed upon human
      beings by enormously powerful otherworldly beings, a compact that may
      not be in humanity's best interests. The earthly votaries of Cthulhu,
      hoping for favors and dispensation, have over the centuries engaged in
      secret rites, ritual murder, and nameless abominations to appease their
      masters. All the while, the Great Old Ones sleep in their undersea stone
      city, R'lyeh, awaiting their Second Coming. That event, while
      inevitable, is to be anticipated with dread, since it portends the
      annihilation of all living things. The Great Old Ones, implacably
      hostile to the feeble human race, are themselves beyond life and death.
      A "much-discussed" couplet in the Necronomicon runs: "That is not dead
      which can eternal lie,/And with strange aeons even death may die." It is
      all less reminiscent of Poe or Mary Shelley than of Cotton Mather and
      Jonathan Edwards.

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------

      The novelist Michel Houellebecq, who devoted his first book (1991) to
      Lovecraft, misses this aspect of his work, but coming from a Catholic
      culture he nevertheless can spot the grotesque parody of Christianity in
      "The Dunwich Horror,"

      in which an illiterate peasant woman who has known no men gives
      birth to a monstrous creature endowed with superhuman powers. This
      inverted incarnation ends with a repugnant parody of the Passion
      where the creature, sacrificed at the summit of a mountain that
      overlooks Dunwich, cries out desperately, "Father! Father! YOG-
      SOTHOTH!" in a faithful echo of "Eloi, Eloi, Lama Sabachthani."

      Interestingly, Houellebecq cites this as an illustration of Lovecraft's
      racism, since "it is not one particular race that represents true
      horror, but the notion of the half-breed." By that measure, the
      Christian myth of the Immaculate Conception would also be a "violation
      of the order of nature," which is certainly a bracing idea.

      Houellebecq doesn't pursue it, though. His view of Lovecraft is
      presumably an idealized self-portrait: a poète maudit who radiates
      negative energy; who answers the imperative of life with a resounding
      "no"; who demonstrates superior breeding through sheer unworldliness,
      which he further elevates into otherworldliness; whose racism, while
      perhaps deplorable, is merely a byproduct of his attempt to face down
      evil--those other races, you see, are mentally and morally weak enough
      to be the servants of the Old Ones. But racism is slightly beside the
      point, anyway. All of humanity, all of life, is repellent:

      To touch other beings, other living entities, is an impious,
      repugnant experience. Their skin bloated with blisters that ooze
      putrid pus. Their sucking tentacles, their clutching and chewing
      appendages, all constitute a constant menace. Beings and their
      hideous corporeal vigor. A simmering, stinking Nemesis of
      semi-aborted chimeras, amorphous and nauseating: a sacrilege.

      Living creatures are disgusting, and their omnipotent undead adversaries
      are also disgusting: the universe is one gigantic swirling vortex of
      vomit. The only remedy, transient and puny though it may be, is to give
      voice to your principled stand in the face of it all. Houellebecq, who
      according to the detailed account of his translator, Dorna Khazeni,
      inserted interpolations ranging from a few words to entire paragraphs
      into his citations from Lovecraft (for reasons that are not always
      clear), found in the older writer a perfect vehicle for creative
      misreading, an elected ancestor who was at once ambitious, marginal,
      conventionally accomplished, and pathologically unstable. It is
      fortunate that Houellebecq, like Lovecraft, has restricted his ambitions
      to literature.


      Notes

      [1] <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fnr1> Classics and
      Commercials (Farrar, Straus and Co., 1950), p. 288.

      [2] <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fnr2> A somewhat different
      Lovecraft emerges from his correspondence. In the five-volume Selected
      Letters (Arkham House, 1965-1976) and in Willis Conover's moving
      Lovecraft at Last (Cooper Square, 2002; a record of the epistolary
      friendship between the teenaged Conover and the much older Lovecraft,
      halted by his sudden death), Lovecraft appears unfailingly generous,
      painstaking, and tactful, as well as emotionally mature, severe in his
      judgment of pulp mediocrity, wide-ranging in his interests, and
      possessing a sense of humor that appears nowhere in his fiction.

      [3] <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fnr3> In "He," another story
      from the same period, he gives, in the guise of a vision of New York's
      future, his idea of a jazz club: "I saw the yellow, squint-eyed people
      of that city, robed horribly in orange and red, and dancing insanely to
      the pounding of fevered kettle-drums, and the clatter of obscene
      crotala, and the maniacal moaning of muted horns whose ceaseless dirges
      rose and fell undulantly like the waves of an unhallowed ocean of bitumen."

      [4] <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fnr4> Dagon and Other Macabre
      Tales(Arkham House, 1965), p. 350.



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • T. Peter Park
      Friends, Forteans, Listmates, Luc Sante refers to The complete absence of even suggested sexuality in Lovecraft s work. He adds that it is clear from all
      Message 2 of 3 , Oct 2, 2006
      • 0 Attachment
        Friends, Forteans, Listmates,

        Luc Sante refers to "The complete absence of even suggested sexuality"
        in Lovecraft's work. He adds that "it is clear from all available
        evidence that sexuality, procreation, and the human body itself were
        among the things that scared him the most."

        It may well be the case that sexuality, procreation, and the human body
        were among the things that scared Lovecraft the most. However, I would
        disagree about the "complete absence of even suggested sexuality" in
        HPL's work. I find it hard to read "The Shadow Over Innsmouth" without
        imagining the revulsion that the Innsmouth sailors--or their wives and
        daughters--would have felt about the embraces of the fish-like and
        frog-like marine "Deep Ones" enforcing their Faustian bargain with the
        economically desperate Innsmouthers who had turned to them for good
        fishing and gold. I likewise find it hard to read "The Dunwich Horror"
        without imagining the sheer horror poor Lavinia Whately must have felt
        as she was impregnanted by Yog-Sothoth. Lovecraft, I think, MUST have
        thought a LITTLE bit about the horror felt by his human characters
        "embraced" by alien creatures and entities. His "Innsmouth" and
        "Dunwich" tales, I've long thought, probably expressed some of HPL's own
        feelings about sexuality and the human body in general--and about
        miscegenation and "race-mixing" in particular.

        Peace,
        T. Peter

        T. Peter Park wrote:

        >
        > THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS
        >
        > October 19, 2006
        >
        >
        > Volume 53, Number 16
        > <http://www.nybooks.com/contents/20061019>
        >
        >
        > Review
        >
        >
        > The Heroic Nerd
        >
        >
        > By Luc Sante
        >
        > Tales
        >
        > by H.P. Lovecraft, edited by Peter Straub
        >
        > Library of America, 838 pp., $35.00
        >
        > H.P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life
        >
        >
        > by Michel Houellebecq, translated from the French by Dorna
        > Khazeni, with an introduction by Stephen King
        >
        > Believer Books, 245 pp., $18.00 (paper)
        >
        > That the work of H.P. Lovecraft has been selected for the Library of
        > America would have surprised Edmund Wilson, whose idea the Library
        > was. In a 1945 review he dismissed Lovecraft's stories as "hackwork,"
        > with a sneer at the magazines for which they were written, Weird
        > Talesand Amazing Stories, "where...they ought to have been left."[1]
        > <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fn1> Lovecraft had been dead
        > for eight years by then, and although his memory was kept alive by a
        > cult-- there is no other word--that established a publishing house for
        > the express purpose of collecting his work, his reputation was
        > strictly marginal and did not seem likely to expand.
        >
        >
        > <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19454#fn2> The complete absence of
        > even suggested sexuality in his work was much debated by fans in the
        > Freud-shadowed mid-twentieth century; the proposition, rather missing
        > the point, that he might have been homosexual sparked ferocious
        > arguments. Although he was married briefly, and many years later his
        > former wife was moved to state, peculiarly, that he was an "adequately
        > excellent lover," it is clear from all available evidence that
        > sexuality, procreation, and the human body itself were among the
        > things that scared him the most.
        >


        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      • evrim olcer
        To Be a Woman in the Land of Tales: Gender and Space in Folk Tales of Turkey By Evrim Ölçer Özünel PhD Candidate, Folklore Dept. Gazi University, Ankara In
        Message 3 of 3 , Oct 2, 2006
        • 0 Attachment
          To Be a Woman in the Land of Tales: Gender and Space in Folk Tales of Turkey
          By Evrim Ölçer Özünel
          PhD Candidate, Folklore Dept. Gazi University, Ankara

          In Turkey , folk tales have hitherto been conventionally taken for granted as fictional texts having little or no correspondence to reality. In her book, Evrim Ölçer Özünel begins by questioning this estimation and choosing 32 tales from Turkey, demonstrates that there is a strong relationship between the world of folktales and the real world through scrutinizing gender roles and various usages of space. According to Özünel, analyzing tales as social records reveals the existence of a realistic stratum that in return may serve for our contemporary understanding of society.

          Özünel contributes to the conventional classification of space as private and public by presenting "window" as an "intermediary" space in-between. Interior of the house, the private space, is almost entirely the living space of women; it represents the integrity of the family, and therefore it must be defended. In return, the most important feature of the public space is that it belongs to men. In-between is the window, the intermediary space through which women are exposed to the public space. The exposition of the young virgin to outdoors proceeds in various stages. The virgin first realizes the existence of outdoors through the window; then she explores it by watching, and eventually desires to be a part of it. Leaping over the window into the public space is a step taken toward building a new family. However, life outdoors is threatening and dangerous for a young virgin who, in order to survive, must use every means of self-defense to remain "chaste", even if this
          requires behaving and dressing like a man.

          When the virgin's adventures outdoors comes to an end by the building of the new family, the social structure justifies itself. Unsuccessful attempts, on the other hand, results in self-destruction which is another way of perpetuating the circular pattern.

          An innovative perspective with a strong theoretical basis, Gender and Space in Folk Tales of Turkey is recently one of the most important studies in Turkish folk literature. It will hopefully be a reference book for anyone who is interested in folklore and gender studies.


          ---------------------------------
          Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.

          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.