Re: [multimachine] Re: A big project!
- All the best for your surgery.José.Thank you guys for working with Alexis.I will have "minor" surgery on my spine (for stenosis) Friday and I have no clue how long I will be out of operation.I wanted to put off the operation until Jeremmy's lathe got farther along but but my legs have gotten too weak to put it off any longer.Pat
From: Dr. Alexis O'Neill <alexiso_nl@...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [multimachine] Re: A big project!Shannon, we are talking to the electrical people again to get more info to provide and also having a lively discussion about the bearings use.
We are learning a lot. Something really good will come out of this. Ricardo and I are making a field trip tomorrow morning to visit the CNC guys, so if we have to design and make some parts, we will have the means to do so without a lot of trouble. We're going to barter for the use of the CNC, we'll work something out, so we can afford it.
AlexisEnviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de TelcelFrom: Shannon DeWolfe <sdewolfe@...>Sender: firstname.lastname@example.orgDate: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:56:45 -0600To: <email@example.com>ReplyTo: firstname.lastname@example.orgSubject: Re: [multimachine] Re: A big project!Alexis,
Welding rollers would only work for cylindrical pieces. I saw in another
post that you also do communication towers. If they are truss
structures, you cannot "roll" them. So, we are back to turning the steer
on a spit. ;-)
While I am here, somewhere in these dozens of posts I saw where David
mentioned air bearings. It might be a good idea to research them. The
carriage and tail stock on this monster will weigh tons. Even very good
ways would present a lot of static friction to overcome. If they are
floated on air, they can be moved with one hand -- or a small motor.
Just one more thing to consider.
Mr. Shannon DeWolfe
--I've taken to using Mr. because my name misleads folks on the WWW. I am a 57 year old fat man.
On 1/21/2013 2:27 PM, Alexis wrote:
> ... my engineer Anibal says that the idea for the rubber tired rollers
> seems interesting.
Forgive the delay, I've had a lot of fires to put out over the weekend and just got back to this. I have attached a basic report on anti-corrosion applications of thermal spray and hope it answers your question about the suitability of sprayed zinc coatings on petroleum pipelines as well as other installations in the field.
Good luck in your research.
AlexisEnviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de TelcelFrom: Rodrigo <rcaetano22@...>Sender: email@example.comDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:31:19 -0200To: firstname.lastname@example.org<email@example.com>ReplyTo: firstname.lastname@example.orgCc: email@example.com<firstname.lastname@example.org>Subject: Re: [multimachine] A big project!
Does anyone know if this process of thermal spray coating could be used as a external protection in pipelines?
We have been using a polyethylene coating and cathodic protection to provide corrosion resistance, but i don´t know if the thermal spray is cheaper or better. I´m working with an iron ore pipeline here in Brasil and we have a great amount of pipes of 24" to protect.
Em 22/01/2013, às 10:21, "Dr. Alexis O'Neill" <alexiso_nl@...> escreveu:
The thermal spray process allows the melted wire to cool almost instantly, we spray with a standoff distance of around 6-9 inches, and by the time the particles hit the substrate, they have almost cooled. I can't comfortably touch a workpiece instantly after spraying, but within a minute or two I can. The adhesion is a mechanical process, there is no heat distortion with thermal spray. This is why we want to introduce the thermal spray here, we can reclaim worn areas over and over again with over-heating them like we do when weld-repairing. Our only problem is too much cold-working before or after spraying that can harden some types of steel and make it hard to grind a nice polished surface, such as equipment/installations in food or medical areas. We need a milling machine, too, but that's down the road, right now we can't properly prepare those huge shafts for spraying, so the lathe is critical, a milling machine would be nice, once we can get everything sprayed correctly. What we would mill would be big and heavy, too, ss plates weighing over 1-2 tons each. Back to the lathe, however.
We do have plenty of big trucks here, we have a nicely developing trucking industry and the trucks here are the same as I've seen on US and Canadian highways. There are more and more new ones, which means old junked ones, and their trailers, so I think we could find parts without a problem. This idea seems interesting, I'm printing it out for Anibal's and Juan's perusals. Anibal works with pantographs and robotics, he will understand this idea and I'll pass on what he thinks.
We don't care about pretty, just what works and is safe to use.
AlexisEnviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de TelcelFrom: "David G. LeVine" <dlevine@...>Sender: email@example.comDate: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:00:56 -0500ReplyTo: firstname.lastname@example.orgSubject: Re: [multimachine] A big project!On 01/20/2013 01:50 PM, Shannon DeWolfe wrote:
Would this work? I know it isn't a concrete lathe but what is needed is a solution to a problem, not an exercise in how big a lathe can be built.
I don't think so because the surface will be so hot that I think the rollers would degrade. That was why the head and tail stock. With that kind of load a trailer can flex many inches. Sorry, that doesn't seem to be a good choice.
Now, support that roller only by the ends and unload the carriage and you could grind things pretty well, but that takes a LOT of power and the measurement tools are not cheap.
Now for the "sneaky" side.
Take a semi trailer and line it up with the head and tailstock (no load on the trailer means it stays relatively flat.) It can carry the head and tail stock, but they set on the ground or concrete slabs. Even a 500 pound carriage won't really flex the trailer much, and the grinder can be pretty light (relatively), but it will have to remove quite a bit of metal, let's say no more than 20 HP. Rotation can be fairly low powered, under 100 BHP. Now for sneaky: Cheap laser diodes can be had (eBay or laser pointers) for a few dollars. Mount two in the headstock (or more), use them to shim the tailstock and the ways into alignment. Now, vertical doesn't matter much, remember I was trying for a few thousandths. So the carriage can move and either grind or spray, two carriages can do both. Air bearings make good sense, as do really stiff ways which won't bond to slag. Let's say polished granite.
Let's see what resources are available! If a tractor (as in a tractor-trailer) with a PTO and a compressor, a semi-trailer and a little hydraulic power is reasonable, maybe we can ask some right questions... The headstock and tailstock sit on the ground or pads (pretty low tech and cheap!) The trailer goes between them and the ways get shimmed to the lasers. Power comes from the truck, as does air and hydraulic drives. With compressed air, we can clean the ways as we work.
It isn't pretty, but it could work. If we can get some fancy stuff done, the laser diodes can be used to find high spots...
I have to look into laser interferometry.
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act of depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest."
Mohandus Ghandi, An Autobiography, Page 446.