Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

[mosling] НАПОМИНАНИЕ: TALK: Типоло гия именной группы

Expand Messages
  • Nina Dobrushina
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 21, 2013

      Дорогие коллеги,
      напоминаю, что в понедельний и во вторник состоятся две последние лекции Марии Копчевской (ниже содержание лекций). Обратите внимание, что их порядок изменен по сравнению с объявленным ранее.

      22 и 23 апреля в 18.00 на факультете филологии НИУ ВШЭ (Покровский бульвар д. 11, аудитория Г-408) состоятся

      четвертая и пятая лекции

      Марии Копчевской-Тамм (Университет Стокгольма)

      на тему «Noun Phrase typology in a cross-linguistic and areal-typological perspective» («Типология именной группы в межъязыковой и ареальной перспективе»).


      Лекции будут прочитаны по-русски.

      На лекции приглашаются все желающие.

      В НИУ ВШЭ действует пропускная система. Для получения пропуска нужно пройти регистрацию: https://www.hse.ru/expresspolls/poll/79477641.html

      What makes linguistic possession particularly elusive is the variety of meanings and / or relations expressed by one and the same construction type.
      The last two lectures in the course will be devoted to the relations which are often, but far from always, covered by what looks like a possessive construction or a construction which is morphosyntactically related to it.

      The fourth lecture will deal with pseudo-partitive and partitive relations between a nominal quantifier and its complement, e.g. a cup of tea
      or a slice of bread vs. a cup of this freshly brewed tea and a slice of Mary’s bread. Both of these constructions will be considered in a cross-linguistic perspective, both synchronically and diachronically.

      In the fifth lecture we will consider the distinction between what I call "anchoring" and "non-anchoring relations".
      In the majority of cases, an entity, indicated by the head of a possessive noun phrase, is characterized via its relation to another entity, indicated by the dependent. Relations between the two differ, however, as to whether they involve an individualized dependent in a NP, as the case is with “anchoring” relations (e.g. Monday’s performance, a friend of my former teacher), or not, with “non-anchoring” relations (a women’s magazine, a journey of one month, etc.). We will discuss the meanings associated with possessive NPs across languages, paying particular attention to the distinction between anchoring and non-anchoring relations. Among other things, we will consider Swedish compounds based on proper names (e.g. Palme-mord-et ‘Palme-murder-the’, i.e. 'the Palme murder'), which present an interesting example of a construction combining properties of typical anchoring and typical non-anchoring constructions.

      Nina Dobrushina
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.