Re: data sharing.
- Hi Perrin, hi list,
sorry, my Template Module use it and so i think it could be so bad, but
i learn gladly in addition,
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 09:46, Jens Gassmann wrote:--
>>maybe IPC-SharedCache helps you:
> I guess maybe you missed the rating where the module's own author says
> not to use it.
> This is based on IPC::ShareLite, like several other IPC modules, and
> IPC::ShareLite is impractical for any significant amount of data. To
> store a hash of objects it would have to serialize the entire hash and
> stuff it into shared memory on every update, and then de-serialize the
> entire hash on the other side every time you want to read a key from it.
> This has all been discussed at great length and you can find it in the
> mailing list archives. The current winners on my benchmarks for local
> (i.e. not a cluster of machines) sharing are BerkeleyDB, IPC::MM, and
> - Perrin
Der Kopf ist rund, damit das Denken die Richtung ändern kann!
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html