Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: E-mail account security warning.

Expand Messages
  • Mads Toftum
    ... Virus. vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?! - lwall -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info:
    Message 1 of 8 , Mar 3, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:58:01AM -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote:
      >
      > What is this? Is it spam?
      >
      Virus.

      vh

      Mads Toftum
      --
      `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall


      --
      Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
      Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
      List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
    • Michael C. Davis
      ... I just called in my HAZMAT team. They re bringing the tongs. Nice try, boyz. Unfortunately, some finite number of people on this list will actually open
      Message 2 of 8 , Mar 3, 2004
      • 0 Attachment
        >What is this? Is it spam?
        >
        >Aloha => Beau;

        I just called in my HAZMAT team. They're bringing the tongs. Nice try, boyz.

        Unfortunately, some finite number of people on this list will actually open
        it.

        --
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
        Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
        List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
      • Jay R. Ashworth
        ... And why is the server *passing* the attachment? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of
        Message 3 of 8 , Mar 3, 2004
        • 0 Attachment
          On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:06:13AM -0600, Michael C. Davis wrote:
          > I just called in my HAZMAT team. They're bringing the tongs. Nice try, boyz.
          >
          > Unfortunately, some finite number of people on this list will actually open
          > it.

          And why is the server *passing* the attachment?

          Cheers,
          -- jra
          --
          Jay R. Ashworth jra@...
          Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100
          The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think
          Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274

          "They had engineers in my day, too." -- Perry Vance Nelson

          --
          Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
          Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
          List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
        • Charles C. Fu 傅建文
          In on 03 Mar 2004, ... W32/Bagle-K aka I-Worm.Bagle.j aka W32.Beagle.A@mm aka WORM_BAGLE.GEN ... Probably the fact
          Message 4 of 8 , Mar 3, 2004
          • 0 Attachment
            In <20040303133021.B20595@...> on 03 Mar 2004,
            Jay R. Ashworth <jra@...> wrote:
            > And why is the server *passing* the attachment?

            W32/Bagle-K aka I-Worm.Bagle.j aka W32.Beagle.A@mm aka WORM_BAGLE.GEN ...

            Probably the fact that it's within an encrypted ZIP attachment (and
            not always with the same encryption key) is interfering with ability
            of some scanners to detect it.

            -ccwf
            --
            Charles C. Fu
            Founder
            Web i18n, LLC
            www.web-i18n.net

            --
            Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
            Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
            List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
          • Render Web
            ... We use amavis spamassasin + clamav at work - this works well. Jacqui -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info:
            Message 5 of 8 , Mar 3, 2004
            • 0 Attachment
              Charles C. Fu (???) wrote:

              > In <20040303133021.B20595@...> on 03 Mar 2004,
              > Jay R. Ashworth <jra@...> wrote:
              >
              >>And why is the server *passing* the attachment?
              >
              >
              > W32/Bagle-K aka I-Worm.Bagle.j aka W32.Beagle.A@mm aka WORM_BAGLE.GEN ...
              >
              > Probably the fact that it's within an encrypted ZIP attachment (and
              > not always with the same encryption key) is interfering with ability
              > of some scanners to detect it.

              We use amavis spamassasin + clamav at work - this works well.

              Jacqui



              --
              Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
              Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
              List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
            • Charles C. Fu 傅建文
              In on 03 Mar 2004, ... It does work well--I use it for my company server, too. However, ClamAV didn t add detection for this
              Message 6 of 8 , Mar 3, 2004
              • 0 Attachment
                In <40463B5D.6060606@...> on 03 Mar 2004,
                Render Web <render.web@...> wrote:
                > We use amavis spamassasin + clamav at work - this works well.

                It does work well--I use it for my company server, too. However,
                ClamAV didn't add detection for this latest ploy until 11:14 GMT
                today, by which time a number of such emails had slipped by.

                -ccwf
                --
                Charles C. Fu ,--
                Founder ___ __ __. . ,-/--
                Web i18n, LLC (_,(_,|/|/ /
                www.web-i18n.net ----'

                --
                Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
                Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
                List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
              Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.