RE: [miniaturebooks] Spiral
- Interesting discussion.
The image is found here:
When I first saw the Dream Spiral, I didn't question whether it was a book,
because it was labeled as an artist's book. But now I've been thinking
about it some more.
One aspect of "bookness" is this, that a book is designed to be experienced
in the context of time. And further, the artee, so to speak, must interact
with the book by turning the pages or lifting the flap or rolling the
scroll, to see the next part of the book. (This might no hold if there was
a mechanized page-turner that did the work for the viewer.)
In order to see all of the Dream Spiral, the viewer must move around. But
that's true of sculptures too.
So I'm wondering what makes Dream Spiral a book and not a sculpture. Or is
it a sculpture?
The poems on the etched copper plates don't, of themselves, make it a book.
Consider the picture book which has no words. Consider the wall poster
which has words but is not a book.
I'm still considering.
From: ThomasPETERX@... [mailto:ThomasPETERX@...]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:56 PM
To: ajaeck@...; email@example.com
Subject: Re: [miniaturebooks] Spiral
I want to weigh in on this subject. I don't think this is an inside or
outside of the box issue. The book is a very large and loosely defined
are many kinds, sizes and shapes of books, a whole spectrum of things, from
what artists make to what Readers Digest condenses. I think the valuable
discussion is about what qualities of a book does a thing have, where on a
of bookness does it fit: from the altered book to literary book, from
letterpress to writing to code, from a shaped leather binding to a metal
does the thing fit. In pursuing this discussion we will create categories of
books and a scroll can be seen as a scroll book, a paperback novel as a mass
produced book, a book written and illustrated by one person as an artist's
etc. My categories need to be better defined and I will appreciate any help
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]