Intel MDS on EBay Item number: 170268336762
I have never seen one of these
Here is what the seller states:
Here is one of the oldest Microcomputers in existance, a Intel MDS devepment system.
This unit is what Gary Kildall used to write CP/M.
(See last photo to see a picture of his office in the mid 70's that includes an identical unit)
A quote from compwisdom web site
Kildall's task at Intel that year was to design and develop a language called PL/M for the 8080 chip,
to be used as a systems development language. At the time, the chips themselves barely existed
and Intel was just then starting to design a computer system that used the 8080. The plan was for
Gary to use the 8080 emulator Intel had running on their big PDP-10 minicomputer, but he preferred
to work directly on the 8080 itself, in part because by working on his own machine at home he could
avoid the 50 mile drive to Intel to work every day. The only 8080-based computer Intel had available
was called "Intellec-8", but it didn't have any software or disk storage attached to it. So Kildall obtained
a used test floppy drive free from Shugart Associates, attached it to the Intellec-8 with a controller
designed by his friend John Torode, and wrote a primitive operating system for it which he called CP/M
I have no way of testing so I must sell as-is
- This is the dumbest argument EVER.
Fairline: Herb takes history seriously. That's good. It doesn't mean the man lacks a funny bone.
Herb: Not everyone takes history quite AS seriously as you or I. That's good, too.
From: fairlanefastback <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sunday, Oct 12, 2008 8:58 am
Subject: [midatlanticretro] Re: Intel MDS on EBay Item number: 170268336762
--- In email@example.com, "Herb Johnson"
> So, I think the only loose thread, is why you were surprised when someof your remarks were taken more seriously than you expected. I presume
you will be less surprised about that in the future.
I'm not sure that I am willing to have to put *WARNING JOKE* or *
TONGUE IN CHEEK* as it seems would be required for you. A "LOL"
denotes a joke. And of course, one can always ask for clarification
if one isn't sure since written communications are not always as clear as the spoken word. Should I counter with a similarly demanding "I
presume you will be less likely to miss the meaning of a LOL or smiley in the future."? That reads like a declaration. Is there really
anything wrong with maybe being a little less uptight and a little
more civil perhaps? I really hope you ponder that for a moment.
This list, does it only want hardcore super serious guys? Thats not very inviting to guys less so I think anyway.
> One comment. I don't think much of using smiley's on statements, soone can later say "I was only kidding".
So a smiley or LOL is never sincere? Its only always meant to have a excuse later on that something was not meant seriously? If I read you correctly thats a pretty negative view and one you should not take on my usage of it.
Anyway I'll shut my mouth on this subject otherwise for the moment, just food for thought in return.
Yahoo! Groups Links