B. Degnan wrote:
> September 1995 / 20th Anniversary / Top 20 Small Systems
> Does this list still hold? You could swap this for that but for the most
> part the consensus has been about the same since 1995, eh? This article
> could have been written in 2005. Not that I agree with it entirely
> myself, but you can't deny the importance of the selected systems.
This list is great! Much better then *most* of ComputerWorld's best
of.. No iPods, iPhones, iCrap etc.. ;)