Re: Semi-OT: history of phone phreaking
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Evan Koblentz" wrote:
> While reading this book (I can't put it down!), I keep thinking, "Our museum should have a blue box on display."I stupidly traded away the contents of the box
but I donated the empty box for a Novation Apple Cat modem
which did blue-box and other tricks:
Now that the significance of that device is clear, perhaps MARCH will laminate or frame the Novation poster I can bring?
So that links the Apple ][, Woz and phone phreaking all together.
As well as the 3B1/Unix PC per Degnan's HOPE exhibit.
-- jeff jonas
>> Now that the significance of that device is clearIt wasn't * not * clear.
>> perhaps MARCH will laminate or frame the Novation poster I can bring?Sure.
One day, when we get more space, there are * many * things we can add to our DIY/homebrew exhibit. Bell Labs was of course an NJ-centric organization, and we need to acknowledge that in the museum. (I have an idea of how to do so * without * waiting until we get more space. Stay tuned...)
>>> Whoa, I just found a significant factual mistake in the book.Finished reading the book. I still highly recommend it, despite the mistake about Bell Labs computer experience, and despite some storytelling repetition in a few of the middle chapters.
I emailed Lapsley to compliment him, politely inform him of the error (and offer to put him in contact with some TRADIC people, re: were they consulted by the telephone network engineers?) and invite him to next year's VCF East (he's already done VCF West and HOPE).
> The hackerspace is a whole other deal. Basically I funded anything thatDid Jen/polishsputnik et al ever get anything off the ground in Blacksburg? Last time I talked to her, VT's CS department was interested in helping fund it.
> wasn't paid by members, members didn't pay that often, my employer has
> only been cutting partial paychecks for the past 3+ years, and others are
> trying to claw into the membership and hackerspace idea for their
> for-profit places. So the whole thing is a huge mess, and I'm kind of
> burned out on it all for a bit. There is some thoughts about taking it
> private and just really driving towards making new things.
- -------- Original Message --------
> From: "Evan Koblentz" <evan@...>switching stations to transistor-based ones. He wrote that by summer/fall
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 10:53 PM
> To: "MARCH Yahoo Midatlanticretro" <email@example.com>
> Subject: Re: [midatlanticretro] Semi-OT: history of phone phreaking
> Oops, I clicked "send" too soon. Full message follows:
> >>> Whoa, I just found a significant factual mistake in the book.
> On page 233, Lapsley discusses Bell Labs' transition from relay-based
1955, the decision was made to build a computerized system. However, there
was an obstacle: "Bell Labs had never built a computer before and its
engineers had never written a line of computer code."
>Computer) starting in 1954 and announced it to the public on March 14,
> That's wrong. Bell Labs developed TRADIC (Transistorized Digital
>What about the 1944 Bell Labs Model 3? Assuming that the Model I, II, III,
IV, V wereanalog computers that one did not program with coded input, he
should clarify that he was talking about an electronic/digital computer.
>> he should clarify that he was talking about an electronic/digital computer.He did. Specifically he meant a transistor computer, which TRADIC was, and which the new signaling system was.
- Phil responded to me this morning and acknowledged the mistake. He said
he'll add it to the errata list at http://explodingthephone.com/errata.php.
He also said he's glad to speak at VCF East 9.1 next spring, pending
Related: I found this two-part article about Bell Labs' earlier
electromechanical computers: http://tinyurl.com/cjmh9fp.