Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [midatlanticretro] Lobo floppy drives

Expand Messages
  • David Gesswein
    ... Those look like the Shugart 800 s that I have. Mine have a manufacturer sticker on the bottom near the spindle pulley. Like this. You can just see the
    Message 1 of 40 , Nov 14, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:19:39AM -0500, Rich Cini wrote:
      > Thanks Bill. Look at ebay 190743958928. There are quite a few pics there.
      >
      Those look like the Shugart 800's that I have. Mine have a manufacturer
      sticker on the bottom near the spindle pulley.

      Like this. You can just see the label in the top picture on the left front
      bottom.

      http://www.recycledgoods.com/zoom.aspx?productID=11495
    • Mike Loewen
      ... Here s the service manual for the Tandom TM-848, with the schematics in the back: http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/tandon/TM848_service_1982.pdf
      Message 40 of 40 , Dec 15, 2012
      • 0 Attachment
        On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, joshbensadon wrote:

        > --- In midatlanticretro@yahoogroups.com, Mike Loewen <mloewen@...> wrote:
        >>
        >> The double-sided drives have a 2S signal on pin 10 of the interface
        >> connector to indicate single or double-sided media. The outputs of the
        >> respective pulse-shaping ciruitry for each sensor is essentially ORed to
        >> form a single Index pulse output.
        >
        >
        > Cool, so I can imagine the two sensor signals going to an RS flip flop
        > to provide the 2S signal and as you said to an OR gate for the index.

        Here's the service manual for the Tandom TM-848, with the schematics in
        the back:

        http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/tandon/TM848_service_1982.pdf

        Knock yourself out. :-)

        > Hmm, thinking about why, I guess the design was to create a hardware
        > error if a user placed a DS disk into a SS drive. As Rich found, the
        > lack of index pulses caused a drive not ready. Correct me if I'm wrong,
        > but in later 5.25" drives, they did not change the index sensor
        > location. Then I suppose the errors created would be software
        > generated?

        The 5.25" drives only had a single index hole aperture.

        > I vaguely remember hearing a discussion about how computers switched
        > from hardware solutions to software solutions, then back to hardware.
        > I just don't know the dates, could this 8" to 5.25" be part of that
        > switch?

        I couldn't say. Certainly Woz did a lot in software for his Apple II
        disk controller design. Another odd thing about the 8" drivers vs the
        5-1/4" drives was that the 8" drives had a write-enable notch, while the
        5-1/4: drives had a write-protect notch. Very confusing.


        Mike Loewen mloewen@...
        Old Technology http://sturgeon.css.psu.edu/~mloewen/Oldtech/
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.