Re: [midatlanticretro] Re: VCF exhibits / vendors
- It is going to happen, vintage computing is going to split some time
soon into two generations. The 16/32 bit GUI era stuff will have a
separate place, just not sure how it will work. On one hand we have
pretty much covered the 70's stuff by now, very little new exhibits
this year of first-time never seen before at a VCF systems. On the
other hand, newer computers are less of a challenge, you rarely fix
the innards, it's not the same hacker thing, at least to me.
If you compare vintage computers to automobiles you can see how
eventually they let in newer and newer cars each year. In the shows
they section them like a giant dealership, with the really old ones
in one spot, the newer ones elsewhere. There are far more newer
ones. That's because there are always a few less of the older ones
each year. If we don't allow for some sort of evolution, eventually
we'll end up with fewer working systems to exhibit.
To Mike's comment
It's hard to justify (for me) classifying Amigas and Mac II's as OK
and not also early Windows (386 at least) boxes, but clearly these
are all next gen systems that have not been fully "vintage-ified"
yet. It's a conversation we have every so often, and no one person
is going to win their argument fully. Me? I welcome the opinions. I
also have been saving the newer stuff too. What's going to happen
eventually is that someone will organize a GUI-era vintage computer
show and the floodgates will open to a new subset of the hobby. And
that's where the younger people will come in as well.
I do not wish to have a *what* is vintage debate, what year,
etc. 16/32 bit computing is historic, it's just a question of how
does one fit it into our "8-bit centric is the heart of vintage
computing" world view. I have a feeling it will be a natural
progression, a little grumbling, and then life moves on.
At 11:11 PM 5/31/2011, you wrote:
>:) and I'm even going to reply with a top post.
>I'm sure you'd be excited to see a Packard Bell Legend "Multimedia"
>486SX25 running windows 3.1 at a VCF :) It's at least 15 years vintage
>now. We'll even get some Grollier's Encyclopedia 2x CD-ROM action
>going. Get us some Prodigy dial up over quality built in 2400 baud
>On 5/31/2011 9:41 PM, Evan Koblentz wrote:
> >> I personally even believe at this point, early plain ol' x86
> >> hardware, MS-DOS, and Windows can be relevant as any other vintage
> >> computing.
> > Damn it Mike ... I wasn't mad before, but now .... !!!! ;)
>Yahoo! Groups Links
- No luck, sorry.From: B Degnan <billdeg@...>Sender: email@example.comDate: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 12:15:54 -0400To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>ReplyTo: email@example.comSubject: Re: [midatlanticretro] Early Pdp 11 assembly training course?Great. Fyi they're practically free on half.com etc
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.Evan Koblentz <evan@...> wrote:>>> The Minicomputer in the Laboratory by James W Cooper 1977>>> Minicomputer Systems: Organisation and Programming (PDP-11) by Richard Eckhouse 1975>>> Machine and Assembly Language Programming of the PDP-11 by Arthur Gill 1978We may have some of these in the MARCH library. Luckily someone decided to organize our books by decade and then by title. :) Will check today.
Yahoo! Groups Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/midatlanticretro/<*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional<*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/midatlanticretro/join (Yahoo! ID required)<*> To change settings via email: firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: firstname.lastname@example.org<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/