Re: [midatlanticretro] Speaking of building stuff ...
- --- On Tue, 3/1/11, Bruce Freeman <freemab222@...> wrote:
>No, it makes very good sense with Gmail. Try it. Gmail hides all theWhile you're at it - lose the HTML email. HTML has no place in civilized conversation. :D
>carried-over messages, but by its nature makes it very awkward to
>bottom-post. I can be just as adamant on this point as you hide-bound
>I will try to remember to bottom-post on this forum, but don't hold your
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Evan Koblentz wrote:
> In case some of our newer members didn't know, one of the really neat
> things in our collection is an unassembled Morrow S-100 kit. We plan to
> leave it unassembled, but maybe lay out the parts and documentation, so
> visitors can see the "building" a computer of that period was different
> than building one today. Sometimes when I mention DIY computing to
> museum visitors, they think it's the same as plugging in modern PC
> components -- "Oh I built a computer too." -- ummmm not like this kind
> you didn't. ;)
When I have time, I'm going to build a vintage SBC kit I have, a SD
Systems Z80 Starter Kit from 1978/79:
I believe all the parts are present. It has two S-100 slots, a
wirewrap area, Kansas City Tape interface, 2758/2716 EPROM burner,
7-segment display and hex keypad, with the ZBUG monitor in ROM.
Mike Loewen mloewen@...
Old Technology http://sturgeon.css.psu.edu/~mloewen/Oldtech/
Is there a source for simple components? It seems that bread boarding modern equivalents of the chips used at the time
might do the trick. It's probably easier to get the discrete components up to the basic ttl chips than it is to get the
micro processor and other more advanced integrated chips.
- On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Bruce Freeman wrote:
>>Hey! We *like* our hide-binding! It's shiny!
>>> (Gmail makes it really difficult to bottom-post, and makes a very good
>>> case for top-posting. Now that I'm down here, I'll go ahead...)
>> Top-posting never makes sense! ;)
>> No, it makes very good sense with Gmail. Try it. Gmail hides all the
> carried-over messages, but by its nature makes it very awkward to
> bottom-post. I can be just as adamant on this point as you hide-bound
> bottom posters!
> I will try to remember to bottom-post on this forum, but don't hold yourS'ok, we'll be happy to remind you all the time. :D
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.simpits.org/geneb - The Me-109F/X Project
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_!
Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical
minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which
holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd
by the clean end.
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Evan Koblentz" <evan@...> wrote:
>Ask the kids if they know what a modem is... If they know, tell them that once upon a time, people didn't *have* COMPUTERS in the house, they were too big, so, terminals allowed people to connect, over the modem, to a distant computer.
> >>> My kids are baffled by that
> Another example: I'm always trying to explain to our young visitors how terminals differ from keyboards and monitors. Consider the SWTPc 6800: there's a box (the computer), a standalone screen, and a large-ish thing with a keyboard. Best I could come up with is to explain that keyboards and monitors are just accessories that plug into PCs, while terminals are separate products that "talk" to a computer over a network. Seems like a decent way to explain this to the masses, technical details aside, right?
These days we use computers to connect to the internet. But back in the old days, a single computer was kind of like a small, self-contained internet in that many people shared it's resources and worked collaboratively within a computer system. They could even "chat" with each other using a chat program on the computer that sent messages from terminal to terminal.
When computers got smaller, but were still housed in separate boxes from the keyboard and monitor, the terminals acted as keyboard/monitor "emulators" via a serial connection.
- Mr Ian Primus <ian_primus@...> writes:
>>No, it makes very good sense with Gmail. Try it. Gmail hides all theDoes this imply that it is OK for uncivilized conversation?
>>carried-over messages, but by its nature makes it very awkward to
>>bottom-post. I can be just as adamant on this point as you hide-bound
>>I will try to remember to bottom-post on this forum, but don't hold
>While you're at it - lose the HTML email. HTML has no place in civilized