30497Re: [midatlanticretro] Our museum needs a working iPod
- May 7, 2013On May 6, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Mr Ian Primus <ian_primus@...> wrote:
> --- On Mon, 5/6/13, Evan Koblentz <evan@...> wrote:A CD player isn't a BAD option, but you could probably get a lot
> > >> Why not use a real cassette
> > player?
> > We have those; it's just easier to use the modern device.
> How is it easier? I mean, the cassette player is actually easier, since you have real, physical buttons to press, and you don't have to mess with some little screen.
> If you don't like rewinding, why not a CD player?
more mileage out of an iPod where you can organize your software
by "albums" and "artists", which have convenient corollaries to
categories and authors. Plus, I mean, 6 GB of compressed audio
(even lossless compression) is going to beat 720 MB of
uncompressed, 16-bit stereo audio (because you don't have a
choice with CDs).
Of course, the amount of software out there for the Apple I is
probably not THAT big. For the Apple II, though, I'd see it as
a clear benefit.
Either way, I definitely agree you should also see if you can
find a reasonable cassette player from the '70s or '80s (bonus
if you use a reel-to-reel) and hook it up through a mixer or a
switch (have an "aux port" out front so people can bring their
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>