Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: How to deal with gamma

Expand Messages
  • nz_observatory
    Hi. It s great to see you guys are still active. It will be good to know I will (hopefully!) have your help when I finally get my own system installed! :)
    Message 1 of 6 , Nov 29, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi.

      It's great to see you guys are still active. It will be good to know I will (hopefully!) have your help when I finally get my own system installed! :)



      --- In metrec@yahoogroups.com, "sirko@..." <sirko@...> wrote:
      >
      > Hi Maziek,
      >
      > I have been working on this topic in the last few days. It seems that
      > two values are critical:
      >
      > * under certain circumstances the nominal lm is estimated ways to bad
      > (in particular when reference stars are measured automatically), which
      > has a serious impact on both lm calculation and meteor brightness
      > * it is also fatal if you use a ref file from a night which was partly
      > clouded.
      >
      > I have implemented some counter-measures which will hopefully improve
      > the situation, but they still need to be tested and it has been
      > completely overcasted here for the last two weeks. :(
      > So don't expect a new beta in the next few days.
      >
      > In the meantime, you should measure a new reference image with RefStars
      > (using the correct gamma values) and then take the ref file from the
      > next really clear night. That should help.
      >
      > Best wishes,
      > Sirko
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.