Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

North Atlantic in Bloom vs SST Anomalies

Expand Messages
  • fredwx
    Note the phytoplankton bloom: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/natural_hazards_v2.php 3?img_id=3641 In the same area as the colder SST s:
    Message 1 of 2 , May 16, 2002
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
    • pawnfart
      The SOI index has been negitive fairly strong, BTW, for about a week, with some strong flaring.
      Message 2 of 2 , May 16, 2002
      View Source
      • 0 Attachment
        The SOI index has been negitive fairly strong, BTW, for about a week,
        with some strong flaring.


        But this isn't as meaningful this time of year. It is too late. The
        Queensland DNR researchers themselves say that the forecast skill of
        SOI isn't very good in the summer, too, and they limit the value of
        the index to more than 30 days. It has to do, IMHO, with lessoning
        spring to summer winds and how far away the sun is becoming on its
        elliptical path and so forth--as the process involved is very

        This newest state sized berg to break off in the Southern Oceans is
        interesting, too, the second in a week, as far as ENSO is concerned.
        At Daly's site there is a ENSO page written by a Dr. Theodore
        Landscheidt: http://www.john-daly.com/sun-enso/sun-enso.htm .

        He is a euro stat guy who has found statistical correlations between
        flaring patterns and ENSO. That's all well and good if the data
        assumptions haven't changed, but, of course, warming oceans have much
        different electrical properties.

        If you have a voltmeter, it's actually a really fun experiment. Now
        if you want to go back to grade school fun, forget the dirty jokes to
        core, play with some salt water! Measure resistance or specific
        conductivity and then nuke your salt water sample and remeasure. Fun
        fun fun.

        The southern oceans are warmer and melting glaciers, but since they
        move from east to west in the circumpolar, they are a moving
        conducter that moves AGAINST cirrus electrically. Hence, if the ocean
        are in general warmer, they conduct AGAINST cirrus more. This if fun
        because you can test for the falsity of what I am saying. If the
        oceans are warmer, to the depths, the SSTS will eventually be
        impacted by the lack of balance of IR radiation due to cloud
        behavior, and they will go cold. Same with the interior. OTOH, the
        water is warm so the glaciers break off and melt. This is especially
        true where the B-21,22 melted off because there is an eddy in that
        region which inducts FOR cirrus. That explains the 5 degree CELSUIS
        anomalies reported there with the melting. The C breakoffs and the
        warmer waters then make for cold anomalies around the circumpolar and
        that is what we indeed have.

        According to Dr. Landscheidt, warm anomalies predate ENSO by four
        months in the Southern Oceans. Well, we have cold anomalies still (no
        Rossby waves, cold temps off coast of Peru to depths and on surface,
        QBO against ENSO (which itself is an electrical feature related to
        Fleming's LEFT hand rule), and anyway, the whole point is my own
        understanding of ENSO as electrical (and biological) comports with
        the idea that as the gyres themselves heat up they bring more warm
        water especially to the western halves of the north and south
        equatorials, especially in the spring when winds peak and there those
        waters are moved by Coriolis to become part of the gyre movement away
        from the tropics. The gyres, back inducting against cirrus in still
        warmer waters, meaning that this cirrus subtraction is very very
        strong electrically, and then the SSTs cool downflow, at the poleward
        top of the gyres. Later, these SSTs spin around back to the eastern
        pacific and El Nino doesn't stand a chance. Throw in melting bergs
        and just forget it. If you go to NOAA's ENSO site you can actually
        see the warm bulge of water that goes warm then cold anomaly with the
        direction wind shift, right from their data. It's all there for those
        NOAA folks, they just aren't trained in electromagnetical behavior or
        understand how powerful a forcing clouds and specifically cirrus
        clouds provide.

        So now when we have a week of SOI that is negitive, it really doesn't
        matter. We will have La Nada or La Nino this winter--no El Nino.
        Indeed, Landscheidt and his stats better be recalculated based on a
        changing experience base--I would pick a time frame that would
        include warmer oceans from Milankovitch insolation variations of
        12,500 to 7,000 years ago BP, when according to coring data from
        Equadorian lake beds there were NO El Ninos.

        A lack of El Nino is going to be very hard on specific regions that
        rely on ENSO to provide "chaotic" stimulas to the biosphere. This is
        an unmitigated ecological and biological catastrophy.

        Interestingly, the Mt. Pinatubo erruption released large quantities
        of SOx emissions. This dropped the phase change temperature of cirrus
        clouds, and global cooling resulted. Oceans cooled--but in this
        context of climate change. When the system reheated, we had a 500
        year El Nino. Counter intuitively, in the Southern Ocean those colder
        oceans meant LESS induction AGAINST cirrus, which equated to warmer
        SSTs and those SSTs wound into the Eastern Pacific. Boom. Monster El

        This, IMHO, is an example of how when the biosphere has balanced the
        chaotic features with the proper biological feedbacks. If El Nino
        does not occur, places like Los Angeles completely dry out and what
        imput to the biosphere they may have will go as well. The cycle is
        also important to places like OZ as well, where fires burned last

        A hydrologist I email exchange with gives this report:

        "[M]ajor flooding on the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers continues to
        grow, and will reach the Dead Zone in the next few weeks."

        I have been teaching him all about hydrates! He's learning well and
        giving me really good river info. The GOM will be cane happy soon.


        Twister season, for the big ones anyway, is about done. Relatively
        colder waters, ironically, reaching the gyres in circling the same
        area in which the warmer waters caused in the north part of the gyre
        cold anomalies now produces warm anomalies. Plus China's Yangtze is
        doing well, which I will discuss more below.

        I know this is confusing, but just got to


        and compare SSTs now to in March.


        Is the NE drought over for now from biological standpoint?

        The following is the best Gaia supporting data link I have seen from
        the government yet:


        Places to check out would be the Yangtze delta. Understand the
        Yangtze is the fourth largest river in the world in terms of
        sedimentation. Three Gorge, the dam project there that is to be the
        largest in the world, or the biggest crap trap in the world, has
        poorly designed sedimentation outlits. It is set to open in 2009.
        Climate is going to get killed that year--that's a solid forecast.
        Already the diversion in November 1997 along with the the flood plain
        resettlement plan, which moved literally millions of Chinese to the
        delta, and then caused many small delta sediment retaining projects,
        which hence caused a drought in the Pacific NW and in part caused
        Great Lake levels to drop to Dust Bowl era levels (of course the CAP
        and the Colorado didn't help the Great Lakes, either). Now that
        there has been some stability gained after the commotion of this, the
        Yangtze is kicking out sediments and if you combine the electrically
        insulating properties of this along with what I described above about
        colder SSTs paradoxically causing the northern portion of the North
        Pacific gyre to produce more cirrus, and hence produce warm water

        This spells the end of the N/S heat contrast that drives the most
        severe weather (read as F-5 tornadoes) in the spring. But it also
        spells the start of the tropical season. It also may mean more of an
        El Nino leaning SOI, but this won't last and it will come from the
        North Pacific side only, not the South Pacific side where yet another
        berg has calved into the Southern Oceans and river activity isn't so
        much of an issue. Yet this leaning doesn't mean we will see an El
        Nino, as I discussed above.

        The Mississippi and its delta subsisting and all the biological
        activity all winter long in the GOM provided precipatation for the
        Great Lakes. This is very good news for the NE and its drought from
        a biological standpoint. It's springtime, and less water is diverted
        over Niagara Falls for tourists, and upwelling is occurring because
        the waters along the NE coast got SO cold. A recent storm also sent
        fresh water flowing to the coast. Now, as seen in the above link,
        there is an algae bloom. All of these indications will prove to be
        biologically significant for the east coast and we will see greater
        probability of rain.

        If you look at the most recent SST anomaly along the NE from this


        You can see light blue patchs, which I realize are cool anomalies,
        but they are replacing black. That means that the cloud dynamic of
        low clouds and high clouds, just owing from the change in biological
        activity, has shifted. Watch this area in the next few weeks.
        However, now that the sping is giving way to summer, will winds and
        ambiant winds provide enough for a return to normal? We shall see--
        this is the danger of messing with the biosphere, because you
        seperate the biological feedback loops from the stimulas. It is not
        stimulas response as the biology intended by stimulas delay response--
        a defect in feedback loops.

        Math is easy. Assumptions and visualization of a description that
        cuts to the chase--that is tough.

        Maxwell's laws are some of science's most difficult to understand and

        Lightning cracks and for a breif instant in time a current flows from
        the ionosphere to the ocean and along the ocean surface, mostly,
        where it is warmest and most conductive. Some of that electrical
        energy flows in the water vapor in the air, too. This flow comes in
        the context of fair weather positive voltage to ground and in the
        context of the insulative character of the lower atmosphere, as well
        as the electrical aspects of the solar wind.

        The electrical field itself, while concentrated in the burst of
        lighting, will act in relation to the earth's magnetic field. But as
        the current spreads and travels, the smaller subsets of its current
        do invariably become an extension of that field. And that is the
        context of the moving currents of the oceans, the gyres. These
        currents are moving conducters through electro/magnetic fields that
        provide the variance of import to capacitive movements of cirrus
        clouds, that like a chicken and egg, provide for more moisture and
        warm conditions or not, underneath these clouds, making for more or
        less cirrus, whose cummulative effect varies SSTs and precip

        I fully realize that I have reasoned backwards from the SSTs to the
        electrical, backwards from Lindzen's iris data and so forth. Part of
        the problem is practical. There are no good measures of the earth's
        magnetic field in the region of a strike. Merely using the earth's
        magnetic field and the conducter of the ocean isn't enough to
        generate significant currents. Consider this link to an abstract
        about measurable induction by ocean currents:


        However, what this links shows is that despite the bursts of fields
        from strikes the orientation of the earth's magnetic field is
        retained. Hence, even as regional bursts of lightning distort that
        field, it is reasonable to surmise that the unmeasurable change as it
        pertains to cirrus also is framed in orientation like the earth's.

        --- In methanehydrateclub@y..., fredwx <no_reply@y...> wrote:
        > Note the phytoplankton bloom:
        > 3?img_id=3641
        > In the same area as the colder SST's:
        > 02.gif
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.