> Well froma sunspot trend you are right but when you consider solar
> eruptions..energtic flares ...geomagnetic activity...I do not know.
> This last one was a dud sunspot wise but look what we saw X-ray wise
> with the 10/03 flares and then this past January with the strongest
> proton flare since October 89'.
I remember the 10/89 flare. Aurora were visible in Charlotte, NC.
Interestingly enough, solar scientists didn't even know there was any
such thing as a CME until the first sun-watching satellites were
launched in 1970 (I think). Cycle 20, which peaked around 1969, was a
fairly weak one. I'll bet the Apollo astronauts are glad of that.
Walking on the surface of the moon is not a good place to be if a
sunspot decides to get nasty.