Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Crichton review (cont)

Expand Messages
  • David
    Very interesting and well done review, Mike. Thank you for doing it, and thank you for your work. I, for one, appreciate it.
    Message 1 of 3 , Dec 28, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Very interesting and well done review, Mike. Thank you for doing it,
      and thank you for your work. I, for one, appreciate it.
    • mike@usinter.net
      ... it, ... Crichton would note Lomberg s book but not, for instance, Lomberg s discussion on cosmic ray flux. Which would get to your work. Horrible.
      Message 2 of 3 , Dec 29, 2004
      • 0 Attachment
        --- In methanehydrateclub@yahoogroups.com, "David" <b1blancer1@e...>
        wrote:
        >
        > Very interesting and well done review, Mike. Thank you for doing
        it,
        > and thank you for your work. I, for one, appreciate it.

        Crichton would note Lomberg's book but not, for instance, Lomberg's
        discussion on cosmic ray flux. Which would get to your work.
        Horrible.
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.