Overall, my predictions in APRIL were remarkably accurate and well
within the limitations of a feedback loop biological analysis where
the more chaotic patterns from the solar input can cause modulations
to take unpredictable forms. Some of that inability has been
catagorized, now that the moon's role of gravity wave stirring is
understood (this is the Little Ice Age forcing per Keeling Whorf).
That is, if it is understood what the moon orbital pattern is
(should be calculatable by Newtonian physics), an even more accurate
picture can emerge, using the solar flaring cycle as a guide to that
chaotic input. Of course, as always, the theory and the model are
limited by my resources--I don't have the computers, data or people
of the NHC with me, even though my long range forecasts are more
liquid_paper4 - 01:18pm Oct 23, 2003 EST (# 5254 of 5826)
BTW, I didn't last week comment that tropical storm conditions in
the W. Caribbean would favor a Mitch like event--such as SSTs are
starting to really show are identical to early October 1998, but I
made this comment in APRIL. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would be MUCH more concerned about a Caracus 1999 like storm. This
is their "dry" season, BTW, and like in 1999 you see a pattern
emerging and rain there. What is interesting is how the solar
conditions were absolutely extreme for the end of October, which was
about when the CV season should end . . . with a bang. My view is
the timing and nature of the solar activity made tropical formation
unlikely, and overcame the modulations by the biosphere. It's like
asking you body to shiver when its 100 degrees out and you are hot
SST anomalies are of interest, and compare to 12/99 in that there is
a cold band of SSTs around Antarctica, BUT some warm SSTs along the
tropical E. Pac.
The ULL vort may be talking about is at 25 / 45? I haven't been
tracking the Caribbean lately because I am much more concerned with
some of the biology stuff that has come off lately. However, that
said, the drought monitor continues to show very poor drought
conditions in the non coastal SW nw to the upper Midwest, Colorado
included. Poor Mark, dumb as a pile of rocks, sees the problem but
cannot really analyze it for what it ismeanwhile, nothing of the
Colorado flow into the GOC and the electrical pathway to aid the sub
tropical jet is more resistive, lesser of a marine biosphere, and
the north EMF continues to shrink . . .
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org
, "David" <b1blancer1@e...>
> Atlantic season: Seven hurricanes, 14 storms, 62 deaths
> MIAMI, Florida (AP) -- The 2003 Atlantic hurricane season was
> than usual, with 14 named storms blamed for 62 deaths by the
> end Sunday, but forecasters say it could have been worse.
> Hurricane Fabian was the strongest of the storms to hit land,
> Bermuda with 120 mph wind that tore up roofs and roads in early
> September. Two weeks later, Hurricane Isabel plowed into North
> Carolina's Outer Banks with 100 mph wind and became the season's
> deadliest and most damaging storm.
> "North Carolina and Virginia were not lucky this year, but the
> the East Coast was," said Bill Gray, a hurricane forecaster at
> Colorado State University. "It's inevitable, I think, that we're
> to have some major hits."
> The six-month hurricane season produced seven hurricanes, three of
> them major hurricanes with sustained wind speeds of at least 111
> putting them at Category 3 or higher on the Saffir-Simpson scale.
> Isabel reached Category 5 strength over open water, but had
> to a Category 2 storm by the time it made landfall near Ocracoke
> Island, North Carolina, September 18. It was the strongest storm to
> hit the country since Hurricane Floyd in 1999 and was blamed for 40
> deaths and $2 billion in damage, much of it from flooding as it
> over the mid-Atlantic states.
> Fabian, which hit Bermuda as a powerful Category 3 hurricane,
> an estimated $300 million in damage and was blamed for eight
> The other Category 3 storm was Hurricane Kate, which never
> The United States has only been hit by three of the more than 30
> hurricanes that have formed in the Atlantic Basin since 1995, a
> that has both baffled and worried forecasters.
> "This can't keep going," Gray said. "Climatology will eventually
> itself and we're going to see more storms, but it's going to be
> different. We're going to see hurricane damage like you've never
> It isn't clear why so many hurricanes and tropical storms have
> away from the United States in recent years, he said. But based on
> historical data, Gray said, he expects more to hit the country as
> as next year, and that could mean significant damage in coastal
> where the population has boomed.
> People living in the storms' paths are benefitting from earlier
> warnings now. The National Hurricane Center's issued five-day
> forecasts for the first time this year, giving two extra days of
> warning about where a storm is projected to hit.
> While the new method wasn't perfect -- Tropical Storm Bill hit
> Louisiana less than a day and a half after the first storm advisory
> was issued -- it was accurate to within 175 miles for Hurricane
> Isabel, unusually close for such a long-range forecast.
> Experts had expected the 2003 Atlantic hurricane season to be more
> active than usual, and it was, exceeding the average of 10 named
> storms and six hurricanes. The first this year, Tropical Storm Ana,
> formed more than five weeks before the season's official start.