Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Severe weather and signal noise of solar EMF and convection EMF

Expand Messages
  • Mike Doran
    http://www.sciam.com/askexpert_question.cfm?articleID=000A3C38-C656- 1C71-9EB7809EC588F2D7&catID=3 This thread starts with a Scientific American report, that
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 3, 2003
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      http://www.sciam.com/askexpert_question.cfm?articleID=000A3C38-C656-
      1C71-9EB7809EC588F2D7&catID=3

      This thread starts with a Scientific American report, that is well
      supported science. What it basically shows is that the earth's EMF
      has been shrinking about 10% over the past 150 years, and about 8 %.
      More specifically, the north magnetic pole of the earth EMF, which
      is located over Hudson Bay, has shrunk. Especially over the earth's
      mid-section, and to the Pacific side of the earth, has the field
      decreased its intensity.

      Which brings us directly to the story of signal noise.

      Understand some basics. The sun not only shines upon the earth its
      powerful radiative forces, energies, but also periodically spits out
      ELICTRICAL energies. These energies, as it turns out, are small
      currents in relation to even everyday electrical experiance, and
      downright miniscule in relation to strikes from thunderstorms. So,
      how could such a small current matter?

      It turns out, that like a bar magnet, the earth has a magnetic field
      that is more powerful on its ends. Try an experiment to remind
      yourself of how bar magnets behave. Turn your magnets on your fridge
      sideways and see how sticky the are. That is because there are
      patterns of force in a magnetic field, and an isobar, which
      describes that pattern, become spread out and not in an attractive
      position on the side. Therefore, when the sun spits out electrical
      energies, they are only attracted to the closed isobars of the
      magnetic poles. And as it happens, these regions where the isobars
      are closed--these are the regions where the there isn't a lot of
      convection . . . up to this time, anyway. Therefore, the currents
      that come from space, though small, are directed to a place where
      they matter. This becomes a "signal".

      If that signal is subject to being fedback and amplified by cirrus
      behavior, as I contend, then that signal will balance against the
      EMFs generated randomly by convection, and the storms that are
      created by the pattern of the solar pulses of EMF will vary
      according to signal and noise of the fields involved.

      The earth EMF, following the rules of a double dymino, will carry a
      momentum of past currents that induct to create and sustain the
      field, so the earth EMF will take on the longer term features of a
      signal noise ratio.

      Think of it this way. Along the isobar path that is where there is
      an alternating current that is amplified. There is an example of
      power theft where a theif will hang up a parallel wire to the power
      companies, and "steal" the power--what is happening is the current
      creates a moving EMF and the wire next to it will then convert that
      moving EMF to an alternating current in the second wire. Likewise,
      the earth will convert that amplification of the space signal, as
      next to this field, like a parallel conductor, and this powers the
      earth's EMF! But, as this induction is removed from the close
      isobars of the poles of the earth EMF, then the power to inflence
      the earth EMF is decreased.

      This has been a description of the EMF from above. But where the
      oceans warm enough, eventually they themselves become so conductive
      that in relation to the amplified signal they become inducting
      bodies themselves, and depending on the direction of current, will
      define regions of convection like the ITCZ or dry regions. Of
      course, over areas where there is no oceans, the signal noise issues
      become more interesting in relation to the earth EMF.

      So some questions come to mind. In the context of human activity and
      increases of CO2 as an ELECTRICAL agent, the oceans have warmed
      about 1 degree over the past 100 years to match the decrease in the
      earth's EMF. Now, if the oceans are warmer, this will mean that in
      the most convective areas, there will be more of a random input or
      noise in relation to or opposing the organized signal of the solar
      winds . . . BUT there will be more of an ability to have tropical
      impedance electrical features, like current direction and induction,
      play a stronger role in the way storms behave. As gaia happens to be
      a land and ocean shore based mechanism, excepting the microbrial
      surface like conductivities changes that occur, for instance, with
      the upwelling and microbrial conductivity changes w/ ENSO.
      Therefore, an increase in the biosphere from more CO2 from fossil
      fuels is going to have an impact on the hydrology in a different
      way, depending on the hemesphere, north or south, just based on the
      fact that more land is located in the Northern Hemisphere. But that
      is not the only electrical regional difference. The Southern
      Hemisphere contains the circumpolar, and a warming of the earth's
      oceans will increase the impedence, or the induction forces, against
      cirrus formation, as the warmer waters will cause greater induction
      there against cirrus, but in the northern hemisphere decreases in
      cirrus activities will be offset by increases, depending only on the
      current directions. Where and how EMF changes occur will depend on
      the salinity and temperatures changes of the ocean discussed, and
      the North Atlantic and Medeterranean are already relatively saline
      and warm compared to the more diluted and cold Pacific.

      At the end of the day, the decrease in a signal noise ratio and a
      corresponding reduction in expression of an earth EMF will mean a
      corresponding reduction in severe weather potential in the US, due
      to the close proximaty of the Hudson Bay to the areas of activity,
      BUT, that doesn't mean that there isn't a dramatic electrical change
      afoot that will have dramatic and non-linear impact on earth climate.

      +++++++++++++

      The proximaty of deserts to the Tornado Alley is interesting to me,
      BTW.

      There is, on the one hand, the organization brought on by the earth
      EMF in a wave of ions that culminates in a large area of ORGANIZED
      convection, BUT, additionally, pulses of EMF from the tropics will
      bring on the point EMFs from short like electrical behaviors, that
      result in the strong instabilities of severe weather. The sub
      tropical jet can bring these instabilities, but are of a nature that
      if the oceans are warmer, the defining currents can bring incredible
      energies that dominate, electrically, a region so much as to cause
      those areas nearby to have no electrical chance of forming a the
      convection required for rain, excepting small seasonal possiblities.
      Such is the character of the Southwest, but it is also a character
      of a region with dominate fair weather and consistant voltages.
      Seasonal movements bring sharp instabilities to the SW at the end of
      the rainy season, that translate electrically to the tornado
      alley . . .
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.