Above is another link to a NASA pic that shows just how powerful the
Gaia consequences to hydrology changes are. What the picture shows is
a dust storm off the West African coast.
In the late 1990s, the West Africans completed a series of
hydroelectric dams along their rivers that flow into the N. Atlantic
near the equator. The biological implications are profound, and hence
so are the climate implications. What the dams do is DELAY WHEN
sedimentation (read bio nutrients) and flow (changing upwelling, and
again, bio nutrients) impact the microbrial biosphere in the near
shore oceans off the coast there. Here, in the spring, instead of
rain to go with the signal noise ratios (read about that elsewhere,
or ask me and I will expound it) and thermo constrasts of changing
seasons, there is dust. Dust is a huge sign of Gaia poor health,
simply because in good EMF conditions dust will be drawn into
convective regions electrically. That is why during the glacials
there is more dust.
Now, the dams are a source of a DEFECT in a living earth feedback
loop. It is from here that a cost benefit analysis should take place,
in addition to the cost benefit analysis of flood control and
generated electricity that goes with the construction of a dam. In
this case it "shifts" the season. Understand with the fair weather
region of the Mediterranean, this area in its proximaty is THE most
struck in the world--and the place of tropical storm genesis. The
ITCZ is completely an electrical animal--and the nuances of how waves
flow off West Africa are particularly sensitive to Gaia changes
The statistics back me up completely. Dr. Gray has noted with the
timing of the dams a change and increase in storms that was so
significant, and not picked up by his rainfall factoring to such a
degree he threw out his factors!!!! He blamed it on the West African
reporting! (He is more conservative than Barry Goldwater and I can
even see him under his breath blaming the ('N' word) for the "bad
data". But the data on rainfall was hardly to blame. What WAS
occurring is the dams have delayed sedimentation and flow and changed
WHEN, electrically, conditions peak for Cape Verde waves--toward
later in the season when point EMFs conditions are much more likely
The picture above is merely consistant with a SHIFTED season, where
during the spring SSTs should have been warmed by more cirrus
sustained biologically and electrically, and the dust removed from
the air by convection, and more rain should fall. But it isn't
because of the dams. This bodes for grave danger LATER in the year
when the waves come off Africa and form tropical storms.
what happened during the Dust Bowl to the delta? To the Rio? Why
would climate follow changes to the river systems?
More on Mississippi delta soil loss.
What about what flows into the GOM impacts the microbrial biosphere
How does microbrial activity impact conductivity--large scale ion
What is the difference electrochemically, between life cummulating
chemistry and chemistry diffusing broadly in the GOM w/out that life?
What specifically about microbrial activity near the surface--where
SSTs are warmest and therefore conductivity highest (the warmer the
salt water, the better it conducts)?
How by methane hydrates? The GOM is full of them. What does
microbrial activity do to hydrates there? How does the fact that
methane hydrates are ELECTRICALLY insulating play in all of this?