> The person I talked to also said that the Bible
> has records which would support the 3,300 year orbit story.
I'm not familiar at all with anything in the Bible that would support
this? Please provide the verses your friend is referring to.
> Guesses like, "The earth turns on its axis
> because it always has, by momentum." which because it was not
> unreasonable, had become accepted.
That's because its true. Think of something as heave as a planet and
turn it at 1000 mph, and you have a tremendous amount of momentum.
Even so, the Earth is in fact gradually slowing down in its rotation
due to tidal drag. Every few years a "leap second" is added to
re-synchronize the atomic clocks to Earth's rotation.
>Here is another one, "Gravity is what
> holds the planets in orbit". "Gravity" has no rules which describe
> planets are arranged in a flat circular pattern, nor demonstrates
> planets all go in the same direction around the Sun, nor why the
> up configuration of the planets known as Perigy syzigy, does NOT
> building up of momentum that would combine force and be much more of a
> problem IF the definition of gravity were consistent with observed
Well, I have no idea what Perrigy Syzigy is. However, gravity has
nothing to do with why the planets are all in a relatively flat disk,
and going in the same direction. It has to do with the way the solar
system was formed originally.
> It occurs to me that if NASA is tracking this threat
that it is a
> known threat that needs to be confronted. Walter
They aren't. I would like to see if you have proof to the contrary,