Re: [Methane Hydrate Club] Solar Activity Report for 8/7/02
- Mike, Bi,
To those that were in on the conversation B1 and I were having about
the Sun's polarity changing every eleven years. If This were true then my
theory about the Solar Electrojet would not be possible because earth records
would have shown reversals every eleven years.
I seem to remember that the Sun goes through cycles of swelling and
shrinking. If these cycles are eleven years long, then this answer could be
the answer to my problem. If when the Sun goes through its swelling cycle it
causes a ground level return of its primary circuit to closely go around and
into its North pole area, then this would look to us like a switching of its
polarity. At the same time the primary flow of its current out of its South
pole and around to all of the planets to their South poles would continue the
record of earth's pattern for polarity.
Listen guys and gals, I met a guy in a laundry last week. He has a
background in electrical equipment and is interested in phenomena of same.
He related to me that NASA is tracking and studying a planet three times the
size of earth that is cycling around and is scheduled to come by our earth
around January. It is named Planet X and can be found at PlanetX.com . It is
supposed to have an excentric orbit which brings it by every 33,000 years.
He said his sister is going to make a bomb shelter that can sustain life for
almost a year, so she and friends can make through the 200 mile per hour
winds that are predicted.
I got to thinking about this problem. It has occured to me that
moving our planet out of the way of the path of this danger would be very
useful. As I have considered the results us spinning the earth faster I have
concentrated on the possibities of earth shape change and resultant
destructions. However if the earth were prepared for possible changes it
might be OK. It has occured to me that if the earth could be spun quickly
for say a 9 hour period and then brought back down to its original speed,
that several things might happen. 1. The earth might strengthen its secondary
frield, which might cause it to be more highly attracted to the Sun, which
would possibly move it toward the Sun. 2. returning its speed would probably
return it to its orbit. 3. If these changes in spin could be smoothly changed
with the proper rheostatic control, perhaps physical results might be
avoided. 4, Even if destruction due to speeding up would happen it could be
planned for and possibly be in no way as dangerous as getting all of the
possible affects of this PlanetX passing. 5. If this thinking is sound, then
It might be critical for a team get together to plan the moves it will take
for us to get controlling poles into place, communications set up to
coordinate such a move, drilling rigs into place to place the poles,
rheostats made that will do the job. To say nothing of considering what to do
about the statically placed poles that we have to remove or insulate so that
they don't add the bulge they already made in the earth's Northern
Hemesphere. These are just a few of the considerations that will have to be
made. Well, what do you think? Walter
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Listen guys and gals, I met a guy in a laundry last week.He has a
> background in electrical equipment and is interested in phenomena ofsame.
> He related to me that NASA is tracking and studying a planet threetimes the
> size of earth that is cycling around and is scheduled to come by ourearth
> around January. It is named Planet X and can be found at PlanetX.com. It is
> supposed to have an excentric orbit which brings it by every 33,000years.
> He said his sister is going to make a bomb shelter that can sustainlife for
> almost a year, so she and friends can make through the 200 mile perhour
> winds that are predicted.I'm afraid your new friend has been badly mislead. To put it more
bluntly, he has fallen victim to a hoax. There is no Planet X, or at
least certainly not one that is going to cross Earth's orbit in
January. Think about it. If there really was an object 3 times
Earth's size that was that close, don't you think it would have been
noticed by many people by now? People all over the world would be
seeing it. There would be a panic on a global scale. It would be
impossible to cover something like that up. Let him waste his time
building his bomb shelter if he wants to. The whole idea is rediculous.
> I got to thinking about this problem. It has occured to methat
> moving our planet out of the way of the path of this danger would bevery
> useful. As I have considered the results us spinning the earthfaster I have
> concentrated on the possibities of earth shape change and resultantDo you have any idea how much energy that would take? What you
suggest is absolutely impossible.