Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.


Expand Messages
  • pawnfart
    Tonight it was 99 degrees F. here in Redding, California--at 9 pm. A year ago at this time I was in a place called Tulsa Oklahoma and it was about the same
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 10, 2002
      Tonight it was 99 degrees F. here in Redding, California--at 9 pm.

      A year ago at this time I was in a place called Tulsa Oklahoma and it
      was about the same temperature at 9 pm.

      But the difference between Redding and Tulsa in the amount of water
      in the air is huge.

      Here in Redding we have "swamp coolers" that simply use water to cool
      things down. There in Oklahoma, my poor brother's nice home with the
      latest in air conditioning was worthless against the heat. It was so
      hot INSIDE his air conditioned home that at 9 pm it felt too hot to
      play cards on his kitchen table--because there was a light bulb above

      The difference between the air there and here is electrical. In
      general the North Pacific gyre along the coast of California is in
      large part about a current that moves slowly from west to east--
      inducting against cirrus, especially this time of year. OTOH, the
      GOM and even the Gulf of California are associated w/ east to west
      movements that electrically enhance cirrus.


      Bates, N.R., Knap, A.H. and Michaels, A.F. 1998. Contribution of
      hurricanes to local and global estimates of air-sea exchange of CO2.
      Nature 395: 58-61.You can see the path and nature of Felix


      What the research stated was that the 1995 hurricane Felix increased
      summertime loss of CO2 from the portion of the ocean it traversed by
      nearly by nearly 30%. When data from nearby hurricanes Luis and
      Marilyn were included, this figure jumped to 45%. The heat exchange
      of hurricanes is undisputed--they cool the sea as they roil the
      surface. But they also bring cooler water up from below. I will be
      the first to note that depressurized methane would lead to pure water
      being released, diluting the water, as well as taking phase change
      energies from the water. Cold, yet diluted, it should lead to
      upwelling of cold waters, and cold waters uptake CO2 better than warm

      Consistent with this notion, the measurements showed no observable
      change in atmospheric pCO2! What was measured was what was happening
      in the water? So, where did the CO2 go? It should be noted that the
      scientists also found a slight increase in mixed-layer depth that
      built up in the days preceding the storm and REVERTED QUICKLY after
      its passing. It is well known that the deep oceans store carbon
      dioxide in a bicarbonate ion form due to the high alkalinity of deep
      seawater, such that for every 100 molecules of CO2 stored in it,
      roughly 98 of these are found as 1 bicarbonate ions, 1 has been
      converted further to a carbonate ion, and only one remains as CO2.

      Here is some chemistry in this regard: (CO2 + H2O <==> HCO3- + H+
      <==> CO32-+ 2H+). Thus, a little CO2 in air (at 1 atmosphere
      pressure) can be in equilibrium with about 100 times more "total CO2"
      in the equivalent volume of seawater. The problem is that most of the
      alkaline ocean water is not in contact with the atmosphere. Further,
      the most alkaline portion of the ocean, at depths, may be insolated
      by the methane hydrates from methanogen activity in the stability
      zone. Transfer of CO2 between the surface ocean and the deep ocean is
      slow, and occurs according to prevailing views, by two main
      processes: subduction of cold salty waters, and the tropics where
      hurricanes occur, this isn't going to occur, the biological "pump"
      whereby organic particles sink below the mixed surface layer. I will
      add a third. In my view, hurricanes contain electrical currents that
      move to the oceans, wholly changing the convection processes and at
      the same time making the CO2 look like it is disappearing in the
      ocean when it is simply changing chemically from the electrical
      current, much like a battery changes chemistry as it discharges.

      Consistent with this, Burke et al. [1992] has reported the detection
      of keV electrons and large electric field transients above a
      hurricane. These various observations all suggest that what is
      occurring at great depths in the ocean may couple to the ionosphere.
      The coupling mechanisms was said by them not to be well understood,
      but it seems probable that "capacitive coupling" through the
      displacement current my drive conduction currents within the
      ionosphere [Hale and Baginski, 1987]. From this link, is evidence of
      the incredible currents involved:


      "Rarely seen lightning fields and purple sprites were detected in the
      eye of the hurricane by the ER-2 pilot as he flew more than 19.8 km
      (65,000 ft) above the Atlantic."



      Variations in Mauna Loa carbon dioxide induced by ENSO

      "There is strong observational evidence that ENSO has a significant
      impact on the partial pressure of carbon in the ocean and, therefore,
      on the carbon flux."

      As ENSO results in warmer worldwide temperatures, particularly
      observable in the troposphere, this is prime evidence that climate is
      controlled ELECTRICALLY.

      BTW, when the last El Nino ended in May of 1998--a third van Allen
      belt formed between the proton inner and electron outer belts. Go
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.