Re: 'I am' is True, all else is Inference of cannisters
- "And now for something completely different" as St. Monty would
say. Here's Maira Louisa's reaction and comments (as reposted
from here on Guru-Satsang by G-ji)about the same Sivananda article:
my respect about your consacration.
This post is so wonderful. All the knowledge comprised in so few
lines. I am grateful for having this to read. The simple reading and
withdrawing of its meaning produces such a connection within
consciousness that it is blissful. I will dare to comment it for it
is so beautiful and i cannot stop doing it.
--- In Guru_Satsang@yahoogroups.com, "G" <crystalkundalini@h...>
> Subject: Re: 'I am' is True, all else is Inference****This is something so true that it is incredible that we aren't
> The sense of "I" is not the same as sensing "I Am"
> Here's Swami Sivananda:
> Experience is never possible without consciousness.
aware of it continuously.
> that is eternal must be infinite and unlimited. Consciousness is****What a simple statement and absolutely undeniable. Any person
> unlimited; the consciousness of limitation shows that
> consciousness is greater than limitation.
intelligent enough just have to read it once and cannot deny a simple
word, for simple reason is the clue here.
Perfection is the
> attainment of immortal life or pure consciousness.****This is something that produces so much fear. People fear the
loss of personal life. And i understand it quite well by my own
experience. This is why the glimpse of the preciousness of
consciousness is what gives me enough strength to continue in giving
up all the ideas of personal doership, even of a person existing. I
cannot imagine how could i surrender entirely if i hadn't had this
first experiential fussion in pure conciousness. Each day i
understand more the words of Ramana: "Experience is said to be
temporary or permanent. The first experience is temporary and by
concentration it can become permanent. In the former the bondage is
not completely destroyed; it remains subtle and it reasserts itself
in due course. But in the latter it is destroyed root and branch,
never to appear again." My comment here would be that even if the
experience of bliss passes by in this first connection to pure
consciousness, the truth is known at once and is impossible to
forget. Even the experience is impossible to forget. But it is only a
remembrance, not a living and continuous bliss. Not in my case at
> of, "Who am I?" leads to self-realisation (Brahma-jnana). Divine****So near, so close, but the veil is also here, all the engagements
> wisdom can be attained only by those who are endowed with
> purity. Tear the veil. Realise the reality.
of daily life that tend to make me forget momentarily.
> Pain is the effect of not having what is wanted, or having what isthe
> not wanted. Brahman is secondless. There is no pain or want in
> Brahman. Therefore pain is impossible in the absolute. Contact
> is the mother of pain. The absolute can have no contacts and
> therefore no pain. Brahman is free from all wants and desires
> because it includes everything in itself. Therefore it is an
> embodiment of bliss.
> Bliss is not an attribute. It is the very constitutive essence of
> self, or atman. As the self is absolute in nature, its bliss is also****This is so true. It is the truth. This is why all the atempts of
> absolute. This is the same as Brahman.
> Annihilate the ego. Reach the goal here and now. Take the inner
> essence and attain perfection. Relax not the keen vigilance
> against your most subtle foes - egoism and desire. Where can
> you see the Lord? I found the Lord where 'I' did not exist.
the construed mind or ideas to obscure this unavoidable meaning are
futile if i remain truthful and faithful upon that which i already
know by experience and grace. It is hard........but this is the
mind's opinion for its own protection and survival(jejejejeje).
>****We tend to confuse it all. There is consciousness of experience
> Where there is no sense of 'I', there is liberation.
as said in the first lines of this writing, but we imagine that there
is an I that is conscious, and the reality is that consciousness is
counscious of this I, that the I sense is a derivation, a consequence
of consciousness itself. If not, how can we say that there is an "I"
if there is not consciousness of it? (My reflections about the whole
It is bondage to
> have the sense of 'I' and 'mine'. Identify with the all-pervading****What i din't understood for such a long time whenever i read this
> soul (atman). You will attain immortality. This is the secret of
> eternal life.
issue of immortality, is that there is no body attaining it, but that
just the dissapearance of the sense of individuality is immortality
>****This was a practice that we where so many times recommended to
> With the growth and expansion of your inmost being, you attain
> greater perfection and fulfillment of yourself, and bliss is the
> result thereof. Purge yourself from self-seeking and egoism.
> Escape from space-time limitations. Lose all sense of
> separateness. Unite with Brahman or the absolute. The practice
> of the presence of God will cause the ego-veil to dissolve.
do. To be aware of the Presence.
> Divine love will now manifest and eternal bliss will flow in. TheBeautiful post. Thank you.
> Lord's grace is ever upon sincere, selfless souls.
> SIVANANDA DAILY READING FOR 5 JULY
> WAVES OF GANGA
"Gene Poole" <gene_poole@q...> wrote:
> Hi Bob... a few remarks:
> >medit8ionsociety <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> > The sense of "I" is not the same as sensing "I Am"
> > Here's Swami Sivananda:
> > Experience is never possible without consciousness. Anything that is
> > eternal must be infinite and unlimited. Consciousness is unlimited;
> > the consciousness of limitation shows that consciousness is greater
> > than limitation.
> Above, remove the 'the' for clearer meaning:
> "consciousness of limitation shows that consciousness is greater
> than limitation."
> 'The consciousness of limitation' is itself, limited.
> One could also say: 'Perspective of the consciousness
> of limitation... ".
> The container of all containers is bigger than all
> containers, except itself. Kind of like those kitchen
> cannisters, eh?
> Now is your chance to 'graduate' from tiny container
> to BIG container! You are in yourself, right now!
> (But none of those statements is either clear, or true;
> it is merely 'cheerleading' the choir. One must already
> posses (at the least) opinions related to these issues,
> in order to 'assume' the truth of such short and
> presumptive statements. )
> > Perfection is the attainment of immortal life or
> > pure consciousness. The enquiry of, "Who am I?" leads to self-
> > realisation (Brahma-jnana). Divine wisdom can be attained only by
> > those who are endowed with purity. Tear the veil. Realise the reality.
> Yet another great and inadequate generalization!
> Like ACIM, the drama is the energy; and the 'helpings'
> of 'truth' are supposed to be deeply implanted, in the
> mind of the seeker. My suggestion: Forget the drama.
> > Pain is the effect of not having what is wanted, or having what is
> > not wanted. Brahman is secondless. There is no pain or want in
> > Brahman. Therefore pain is impossible in the absolute. Contact is the
> > mother of pain. The absolute can have no contacts and therefore no
> > pain. Brahman is free from all wants and desires because it includes
> > everything in itself. Therefore it is an embodiment of bliss.
> Well... DUH!
> > Bliss is not an attribute. It is the very constitutive essence of the
> > self, or atman. As the self is absolute in nature, its bliss is also
> > absolute. This is the same as Brahman.
> Sorry, dude. We are not 'enlightened' by reasoning alone;
> thus, your formulations of words simply fight for dominance
> in a ghetto of existing impressions. Ever see 'Fight Club'?
> > Annihilate the ego. Reach the goal here and now. Take the inner
> > essence and attain perfection. Relax not the keen vigilance against
> > your most subtle foes - egoism and desire. Where can you see the
> > Lord? I found the Lord where 'I' did not exist.
> "Annihilate the ego", eh? Ever try to strangle yourself
> with your own hands? Get real, dude!
> > Where there is no sense of 'I', there is liberation.
> More like, where there is no sense of 'you', O
> purveyor of puerile pap!
> > It is bondage to [there is no liberation without bondage!]
> > have the sense of 'I' and 'mine'. Identify with the all-pervading
> > soul (atman). You will attain immortality. This is the secret of
> > eternal life.
> Secret? Eternal life, is that there is no life!
> Ya can't lose what you don't have!
> > With the growth and expansion of your inmost being, you attain
> > greater perfection and fulfillment of yourself, and bliss is the
> > result thereof.
> Or, tumors.
> Now come on, guy... bliss as a result?
> How about what you said up above, eh?
> > Purge yourself from self-seeking and egoism. Escape
> > from space-time limitations. Lose all sense of separateness. Unite
> > with Brahman or the absolute.
> Yes, sir! Thou speakest, I obeyest!
> > The practice of the presence of God
> > will cause the ego-veil to dissolve.
> Whose... mine, or God's?
> I thought that God kinda enjoyed
> me-as-His-veil! I can tell, cause he
> is laughing it up, right now!
> > Divine love will now manifest and eternal bliss will flow in. The
> > Lord's grace is ever upon sincere, selfless souls.
> Sincere? Like, you mean, uh... without will?
> > SIVANANDA DAILY READING FOR 5 JULY
> > WAVES OF GANGA
> Waves of... Ganga? You mean... a 'sea of green'?
> Now, that I can go for!
> later, Bud...
> > "cornelius" <d_agenda2000@y...> wrote:
> > > From "I am That"
> > >
> > > Maharaj: The perceiver of the world, is he prior to the world, or
> > > does he come into being along with the world?
> > >
> > > Q: What a strange question! Why do you ask such questions?
> > >
> > > M: Unless you know the correct answer, you will not find peace.