Re: [Meditation Society of America] Re: Ganga vs. Judi
- --- medit8ionsociety <email@example.com> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org,Darn! and I always thought the filth was the greatest
> "Judi Rhodes"
> <judirhodes@z...> wrote:
> > OK here it is:
> > 17 posts by Judi since the only one dealing with
> meditation (and
> > quoted Da about how meditation was no good).
> > ********* No. It explained what it is and what
> it isn't.
> No "good" or "bad" to it.
> I agree. I was being facetitious. Or, because I'm
> not sure how to
> spell it, maybe I wasn't :-)
> > You both have so much to
> > offer those who seek evolution in consciousness.
> Share that here
> > not,
> > ******* I am, but you continue to miss. You
> will not find it in
> any "methods" or "logic".
> > Judi
> Oh no - I "got it". Yup, I'm well familar with that
> "No method, No
> logic" logical method :-)
> Now, about this site. It has the potential to be a
> real treat for
> those who need a treatment. But you know what? It's
> all in the
> packaging. If you have a sweet chocolate, nobody
> will want to take it
> if it's wrapped in barbed wire. And if it's covered
> with filth,
> people will even run away from it :-)
> Not to say that you guys have been that bad,
> but....hey wait a
> minute....yes you have!:-)
> Peace and blessings,
selling point (sweetly speaking)... Oh well, back to
Peace and Love
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.