- ... jodyrrr ... Belyea ... promote ... self-constructed ... of these ... themselves. ... construct Dan for the sake of potential devotees as the happyMessage 1 of 72 , Apr 1, 2003View Source--- In email@example.com, "jodyrrr"
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "JeffBelyea" <jeff@s...> wrote:
> > --- In email@example.com,"jodyrrr"
> > <jodyrrr@y...> wrote:Belyea"
> > > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Jeff
> > <jeff@s...> wrote:promote
> > > > It was still Dan's generous description.
> > > >
> > > > Still enjoying life,
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > >
> > > Correct. It was Dan's observation that there are those who
> > > themselves as being beyond identity via the agency of aself-constructed
> > > identity termed the "happy meditator," an identity that manyof these
> > > "happy meditators" either refuse to see or cannot see inthemselves.
> >construct Dan for the sake of potential devotees as the "happy
> > Termed by Dan, any way you cut it.
> Right. The difference being seen from here is that Dan doesn't
meditators" appear to do. That is, Dan is Dan and calls it as he
sees it, and the "happy meditators" are various individuals who
have wrapped themselves in the robes of a "happy meditator"
expressly for the purpose of making themselves attractive to
G: Berkow Dan n/a Yes n/a Cyberspace Non-Dualism /
he is listed as a teacher .... so once again doesn't matter
he plays at being the anti-guru .... and trust me there are more
seekers looking for these type of anti-guru's... as it feeds egos
if he were just dan then guess what he wouldn't be on every
advaita list known to mankind..... espousing being just dan.....
he would just be out living life ......
wake up call.....
- ... i ... those ... and ... sourse...and ... solid ... stone ... further ... and ... yes, thank you very much for your compliments,it s niice when a window ofMessage 72 of 72 , Apr 2, 2003View Source--- In email@example.com, "freyjartist"
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Gene Poole"i
> <gene_poole@q...> wrote:
> > --- In email@example.com, devianandi
> <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > what's wrong with being devious?
> > >
> > > it's just another activity of god, which is the only one here --
> > > remember?
> > >
> > > no, i forgot but thanks for reminding me that in the beginning
> > > alone existed i was perfect and tranquil and then somethingthose
> > > and i divided into two, then those two divided into two and
> > > into two and into two and into two untill there were millionsand
> > > trillions of particles of my sparkly light god energiessourse...and
> > > moving further and further away from my center, the
> > > down down went all those particles of God energies until a
> > > point was reached and that particle of God energy became astone
> > > the material universes were formed and since there was no
> > > down to go those particles of god started to go back up up upand
> > > after millions and trillions of divirse forms of existence youryes, thank you very much for your compliments,it's niice when a
> > > almost home, to your sourse, which is me
> > Cool!
> > ==GP==
> Yes! Way cool!
window of opportunity opens up and i get to goof around, you know
evrytime i say something negative or hurtful it causes me pain..
baba hari dass tells me to love God and love myself and i will see
love everywhere...when i do this love god and love myself it really
happens, i see love everywhere,,,but when i forget god and forget
myself and look at negativity it's like that stone that catches all
the mossss rolling down the hill,,,