Re: Quick, patent this: Status-Quo Meditation NOW!
- "Gene Poole" wrote:
> But now, finally, at last... direct to you fromKarta: not erotic!? that sucks!
> ==Gene Poole== Spiritual Sciences Laboratories...
> Now you... yes, YOU... can finally be a SPECIAL PERSON!
> I'm not talking about exotic, esoteric, or even
> erotic... no,
> I'm talking about THE HERE AND NOW!Karta: I am with you Gene, oh! the
> Free enlightenment... NOW!
> Step one: 'Realize' that 'what is,
> is what is'
> Step two: There is no step two!
> Step three: See step two!
> Of course, the 'sophists' among us
> will ask 'what is the meaning of
> 'what'? Or,
> 'that depends on what 'is' is...
glorious seventies when after Erich
Fromm, Suzuki, Allan Watts, Ram Das
and Rajnesh I went with Dr Timothy
Leary; to Realize; as He stated in
" What is IS " !!!
and I AM of course: who I am <grin>
"The first rule of every law-and-order
system is to trivialize-daemonize
the dangerous concepts of Self,
Individual Aims, and Personal
Knowledge. Thinking for Your Selves
is heretical, treasonous,
blasphemous. Only devils and
satans do it. Creative thinking,
committed out loud, becomes a capital
crime. It was Three Strikes and
Youre Out for several hundred
thousand Protestant dissenter
during the Inquisitions of the
Roman papacy-not to forget the
witch-burnings performed by the
Protestants when they took charge
of the Chaos-control department."
Love and Peace and RIGHT
> But no! No "buts"!Karta: unless if you are judi: wo
> What is, is... and what is not, is not...
> Now, could it get any simpler?
> No suffering required! No new wardrobe!
> (unless of course you desire one!)
according to Dan B PhD suffers, likes
to suffer and wants everybody else
to suffer so she can feel alive
here is a piece might help her out
from her stupor:
> Can you say out loud:
> "Gee, You Are You"
> Gosh... I am me, too!
> ==Gene Poole==
> *****And one more thing! If you have PEACE, that is what you have!
> And if you don't have it and you want it, you won't have it until you
> get it! And if you get it, will you be at peace with having it? Of course=
> you will... if it is actually peace that you have. But if you think you h=
> peace, but are not at peace with having peace, you don't have peace!
> (Judi... we said 'peace', not 'piece'! Now step away from the
> .357! ... )