Re: Daily Practice
- Hi Freyja --
> I realize i am not the only one reading here,It seems you have taken it on yourself to improve
> so any dialogues may be helpful to any number of
> readers, but let me see if i can convey something
> from my perspective that may or may not be of
> benefit to your means of communicating.
my means of communicating. To me, that means
we're already not communicating ... :-)
> <<This is only contradiction to the linear mind whichThat's okay with me.
> thinks reality must be either this or that --
> in the example I gave: either timelessness or
> time -->>
> I "know", on whatever level i know, that reality
> does not have to be this or that. This is a given.
> But the way that you said it--it did not come
> across that way to me. In fact, to me, there
> is duality in those words.
I'm not trying to get duality out of those words.
> you might say, those words are only dual toOkay, I won't.
> a dual mind. i hope you dont, though.
You're right, that's probably not a great response.
So, to say something other than what you warned
me not to say, I'll go with:
"I'm not trying to get the duality
out of those words."
> in any case, thanks.You're welcome.
Thanks to you, too.