Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [Meditation Society of America] "Spaciousness"

Expand Messages
  • jogeshwarmahanta
    Dear Sandeep, Can you accomodate the following realities? The opposing forces, eros/life instinct/centripetal forces and thanotos/death instinct/centrifugal
    Message 1 of 8 , Mar 2, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear Sandeep,

      Can you accomodate the following realities?

      The opposing forces, eros/life instinct/centripetal forces and
      thanotos/death instinct/centrifugal forces are operating
      spontaneously in us. The purpose of meditation is to maximise the
      former and minimise the later.

      regards,
      Jogeshwar






      --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, Sandeep
      <sandeep1960@...> wrote:
      >
      > *
      >
      > In spontaneity, there is neither the favourable nor the
      unfavourable.
      >
      > In spontaneity, there is no consciousness about spontaneity.
      >
      > **And there is nothing which is not spontaneous.:-)
      >
      >
      > *
      >
      > jogeshwarmahanta wrote:
      >
      > > And not on favourable spontaneity?
      > >
      > > regards,
      > > Jogeshwar
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
      -------
      > >
      >
    • Sandeep
      * In the presence of a sense of purpose*, *there is no meditation. Which is not to say that activities do not happen, with which is associated a sense of
      Message 2 of 8 , Mar 2, 2006
      • 0 Attachment


        In the presence of a sense of purpose
        , there is no meditation.

        Which is not to say that activities do not happen, with which is associated a sense of purpose and which is then believed to be meditation.



        The maximizing/minimizing hoopla,  viewed as profound meditation is no different to the same hoopla in the market place.


        The same round and round the mulberry bush.

        Just that the bush has been replaced.:-)



        In meditativeness, there is the absence of the sense of the entity,

        and thus the absence of the sense of a distinction, the sense of any distinction,

        and thus the absence of any craving to maximize something or minimize something else.





        In a deeper sense (so to say).........even this distinction of what is meditativeness and what is not.........really has no basis.

        Which means, that in all the sense of the attempts to maximize something or minimize something else, .....

        ....nothing is actually getting maximized or minimized.




        Thus spaciousness, meditativeness  .........is the very absence of the presence of concepts of "spaciousness", "meditativeness".....

        .....AND....

        .....the absence of the absence of the
        presence of concepts of "spaciousness", "meditativeness".








        jogeshwarmahanta wrote:
        Dear Sandeep,

        Can you accomodate the following realities?

        The opposing forces, eros/life instinct/centripetal forces and
        thanotos/death instinct/centrifugal forces are operating
        spontaneously in us. The purpose of meditation is to maximise the
        former and minimise the later.

        regards,
        Jogeshwar






        --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, Sandeep
        <sandeep1960@...> wrote:
        >
        > *
        >
        > In spontaneity, there is neither the  favourable nor the
        unfavourable.
        >
        > In spontaneity, there is no consciousness about spontaneity.

        > **And  there is nothing which is not spontaneous.:-)
        >
        >
        > *
        >
        > jogeshwarmahanta wrote:
        >
        > > And not on favourable spontaneity?
        > >
        > > regards,
        > > Jogeshwar
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
        -------
        > >
        >





      • jogeshwarmahanta
        Crowding or clarity? regards, Jogeshwar ... meditation. ... is no ... entity, ... any ... minimize ... what is ... something ... the ...
        Message 3 of 8 , Mar 2, 2006
        • 0 Attachment
          Crowding or clarity?

          regards,
          Jogeshwar









          --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, Sandeep
          <sandeep1960@...> wrote:
          >
          >
          > *
          > In the presence of a sense of purpose*, *there is no meditation.
          >
          > Which is not to say that activities do not happen, with which is
          > associated a sense of purpose and which is then believed to be
          meditation.
          > *
          >
          >
          > *The maximizing/minimizing hoopla, viewed as profound meditation
          is no
          > different to the same hoopla in the market place.
          >
          >
          > The same round and round the mulberry bush.
          >
          > Just that the bush has been replaced.:-)
          >
          >
          >
          > **In meditativeness, there is the absence of the sense of the
          entity,
          >
          > and thus the absence of the sense of a distinction, the sense of
          any
          > distinction,
          >
          > and thus the absence of any craving to maximize something or
          minimize
          > something else.
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > In a deeper sense (so to say).........even this distinction of
          what is
          > meditativeness and what is not.........really has no basis.
          >
          > Which means, that in all the sense of the attempts to maximize
          something
          > or minimize something else, .....
          >
          > ....nothing is actually getting maximized or minimized.
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > Thus spaciousness, meditativeness .........is the very absence of
          the
          > presence of concepts of "spaciousness", "meditativeness".....
          >
          > .....AND....
          >
          > .....the absence of the absence of the **presence of concepts of
          > "spaciousness", "meditativeness".
          >
          >
          >
          > *
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > jogeshwarmahanta wrote:
          >
          > > Dear Sandeep,
          > >
          > > Can you accomodate the following realities?
          > >
          > > The opposing forces, eros/life instinct/centripetal forces and
          > > thanotos/death instinct/centrifugal forces are operating
          > > spontaneously in us. The purpose of meditation is to maximise the
          > > former and minimise the later.
          > >
          > > regards,
          > > Jogeshwar
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > > --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, Sandeep
          > > <sandeep1960@> wrote:
          > > >
          > > > *
          > > >
          > > > In spontaneity, there is neither the favourable nor the
          > > unfavourable.
          > > >
          > > > In spontaneity, there is no consciousness about spontaneity.
          > > >
          > > > **And there is nothing which is not spontaneous.:-)
          > > >
          > > >
          > > > *
          > > >
          > > > jogeshwarmahanta wrote:
          > > >
          > > > > And not on favourable spontaneity?
          > > > >
          > > > > regards,
          > > > > Jogeshwar
          > > > >
          > > > >
          > > > >
          > > > >
          > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------
          ----
          > > -------
          > > > >
          > > >
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > > SPONSORED LINKS
          > > Health and wellness
          > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
          t=ms&k=Health+and+wellness&w1=Health+and+wellness&w2=Alternative+medi
          cine&w3=Health+wellness+product&w4=Health+and+wellness+program&w5=Hea
          lth+promotion+and+wellness&w6=Womens+health+and+wellness&c=6&s=180&.s
          ig=EXNMaXjzdD625QVOSfycZQ>
          > > Alternative medicine
          > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
          t=ms&k=Alternative+medicine&w1=Health+and+wellness&w2=Alternative+med
          icine&w3=Health+wellness+product&w4=Health+and+wellness+program&w5=He
          alth+promotion+and+wellness&w6=Womens+health+and+wellness&c=6&s=180&.
          sig=AKLTt4BzEowlx_fMo9Mesg>
          > > Health wellness product
          > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
          t=ms&k=Health+wellness+product&w1=Health+and+wellness&w2=Alternative+
          medicine&w3=Health+wellness+product&w4=Health+and+wellness+program&w5
          =Health+promotion+and+wellness&w6=Womens+health+and+wellness&c=6&s=18
          0&.sig=ANuYpnMt0BsauOHzsD3YSw>
          > >
          > > Health and wellness program
          > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
          t=ms&k=Health+and+wellness+program&w1=Health+and+wellness&w2=Alternat
          ive+medicine&w3=Health+wellness+product&w4=Health+and+wellness+progra
          m&w5=Health+promotion+and+wellness&w6=Womens+health+and+wellness&c=6&
          s=180&.sig=pHZBGgbCh5XWvIDO8C-vvg>
          > > Health promotion and wellness
          > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
          t=ms&k=Health+promotion+and+wellness&w1=Health+and+wellness&w2=Altern
          ative+medicine&w3=Health+wellness+product&w4=Health+and+wellness+prog
          ram&w5=Health+promotion+and+wellness&w6=Womens+health+and+wellness&c=
          6&s=180&.sig=Hacy7gxGT2QRKggi1r5E6g>
          > > Womens health and wellness
          > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
          t=ms&k=Womens+health+and+wellness&w1=Health+and+wellness&w2=Alternati
          ve+medicine&w3=Health+wellness+product&w4=Health+and+wellness+program
          &w5=Health+promotion+and+wellness&w6=Womens+health+and+wellness&c=6&s
          =180&.sig=UIW0q6-CQ9Ur4pUMyQCZIw>
          > >
          > >
          > >
          > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
          -------
          > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
          > >
          > > * Visit your group "meditationsocietyofamerica
          > >
          <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/meditationsocietyofamerica>" on
          > > the web.
          > >
          > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
          > > meditationsocietyofamerica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
          > > <mailto:meditationsocietyofamerica-
          unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
          > >
          > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
          of
          > > Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
          > >
          > >
          > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
          -------
          > >
          >
        • Bruce Morgen
          The true meditative state is the spontaneous absence of all intent. When such a state becomes the default perceptual (non-)condition associated with a nominal
          Message 4 of 8 , Mar 2, 2006
          • 0 Attachment
            The true meditative state is
            the spontaneous absence of all
            intent. When such a state
            becomes the default perceptual
            (non-)condition associated with
            a nominal individual (i.e. when
            there's no service for said
            individual's thoughts to perform
            on the host organism's behalf),
            it is often referred to as
            "realization," "enlightenment,"
            or some such hoopla -- one
            supposes on account of its
            apparent rarity among our
            species.


            Sandeep wrote:

            >
            > *
            > In the presence of a sense of purpose*, *there is no meditation.
            >
            > Which is not to say that activities do not happen, with which is
            > associated a sense of purpose and which is then believed to be meditation.
            > *
            >
            >
            > *The maximizing/minimizing hoopla, viewed as profound meditation is
            > no different to the same hoopla in the market place.
            >
            >
            > The same round and round the mulberry bush.
            >
            > Just that the bush has been replaced.:-)
            >
            >
            >
            > **In meditativeness, there is the absence of the sense of the entity,
            >
            > and thus the absence of the sense of a distinction, the sense of any
            > distinction,
            >
            > and thus the absence of any craving to maximize something or minimize
            > something else.
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > In a deeper sense (so to say).........even this distinction of what is
            > meditativeness and what is not.........really has no basis.
            >
            > Which means, that in all the sense of the attempts to maximize
            > something or minimize something else, .....
            >
            > ....nothing is actually getting maximized or minimized.
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > Thus spaciousness, meditativeness .........is the very absence of the
            > presence of concepts of "spaciousness", "meditativeness".....
            >
            > .....AND....
            >
            > .....the absence of the absence of the **presence of concepts of
            > "spaciousness", "meditativeness".
            >
            >
            >
            > *
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > jogeshwarmahanta wrote:
            >
            >> Dear Sandeep,
            >>
            >> Can you accomodate the following realities?
            >>
            >> The opposing forces, eros/life instinct/centripetal forces and
            >> thanotos/death instinct/centrifugal forces are operating
            >> spontaneously in us. The purpose of meditation is to maximise the
            >> former and minimise the later.
            >>
            >> regards,
            >> Jogeshwar
            >>
            >>
            >>
            >>
            >>
            >>
            >> --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, Sandeep
            >> <sandeep1960@...> wrote:
            >> >
            >> > *
            >> >
            >> > In spontaneity, there is neither the favourable nor the
            >> unfavourable.
            >> >
            >> > In spontaneity, there is no consciousness about spontaneity.
            >> >
            >> > **And there is nothing which is not spontaneous.:-)
            >> >
            >> >
            >> > *
            >> >
            >> > jogeshwarmahanta wrote:
            >> >
            >> > > And not on favourable spontaneity?
            >> > >
            >> > > regards,
            >> > > Jogeshwar
            >> > >
            >
          Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.