Re: [Meditation Society of America] Qualified non-dualism or non-dualism
- Yoo-hoo JJM,A somewhat dated post...Some two cents...----- Original Message -----From: jasonjamesmorganSent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:28 AMSubject: [Meditation Society of America] Qualified non-dualism or non-dualism
1. If you were to get a splinter in your foot, do you remove it? Or
do you realize there is no foot, no splinter, no pain.There is none.And yet a splinter may be removed.Or remains embedded.
Ramana sat to close to the fire once and severely burnt his legs.Ramana did not.Yes the psycho-somatic organism which maybe labeled "Ramana", Buddha", "George W Bush/Osama Ben laden".............so long such an organism is "alive"..........if it sits on a hot stove, .......the organism will rapidly ascend.
2. I am told you non-dual types believe in nothing.Not even that nothing.And there is no non-dual types.Or to put it in another manner........there is not a whit difference between a non-dual type and a dual-type.Do you believe in yourself?What is this "yourself"?If you only accept your awareness, do you accept mine?There is no "your" or "my" awareness.
If you accept mine, you must accept God. That in which we live, move
and have our being. Qualified non-dualism.Aceept whatever rocks.Reject whatever rocksBoth sneezings of the dreamt up character of the last night sleep dream.
3. Do you accept qualified non-dualism? Or do you only practice non-
dualsim?What is qualified non-dualism?What is the practice non-dualism?If so, do you have sex, enjoy food, etc.?Very much.And you forgot a good Cohiba.Sex is mere humping,.......... while a good cigar..........now that's something.The difference
between tasting sugar and being sugar.Being somewhat wet-behind the ears, can you please explain what is that difference?Do you act non-dual(ie
Ramana)That dude in the diaper was acting?or are you a hipocrit and really practice qualified non-
dualism(ie papaji).So non-hypocrisy lies in practicing non-qualified non-dualism?Can any "ism" escape a qualification?Non-qualification..............is not a qualification?Act non-dual as well as talk non-dual.How do you act non-dual?
The Holy Mother prepares food according to the childs temperments.
Let us see if I can cook some good old fashion, home cooked non-dual
Bhakti, non-dual Gnani style. I get the feeling it would be less
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Sandeep"
> Yoo-hoo JJM,non-dualism
> A somewhat dated post...
> Some two cents...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jasonjamesmorgan
> To: email@example.com
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 12:28 AM
> Subject: [Meditation Society of America] Qualified non-dualism or
> 1. If you were to get a splinter in your foot, do you remove
> do you realize there is no foot, no splinter, no pain.JJM. A mental splinter, like a thought can be removed with non-
> There is none.
> And yet a splinter may be removed.
> Or remains embedded.
A phiscial splinter, like a splinter :), can be removed with tweezers.
The difference between sahaja savikalpa samadhi and sahaja nirvikalpa
samadhi is that one dude would have moved back from the fire, to the
other there was no fire, and no legs.
I guess the defence mechanism of refutation might come from believing
that you have the same power as the president.
A king demand a yogi tell him a special mantra. The yogi refused.
When asked he sayed it would not work for him. The king tripped out
and demanded to know why. Just then the yogi tripped out and ordered
a guard nearby to sieze the king. The guard did not even blink. The
king then got angrier and odered the guard to sieze the yogi. The
yogi became histarical with laughter when the gaurd grabbed him. The
yogi said he had just demonstrated why it would not work.
What if there is such things as avatars? Miracles........
So this distinction is valid in my books.
Ramana was the Man.
If you want to know my description of the distinction between
Savikalpa Samadhi and Nirvikalpa Samadhi, I am sure it is still
floating around on web. Type my full name in exact search in
google. Feel free to send me refutations. I enjoy learning more
>Buddha", "George W Bush/Osama Ben laden".......
> Ramana sat to close to the fire once and severely burnt his legs.
> Ramana did not.
> Yes the psycho-somatic organism which maybe labeled "Ramana",
>a hot stove, .......the organism will rapidly ascend.
> ......so long such an organism is "alive"..........if it sits on
>JJM. So sit on a hot stove. The natural abidance in the effulgence
of Self, is preceded by the un-natural abidance in the effulgence of
He however was already boiled, a fresh pot.
Sahaja Nirvikalpa Samadhi is different than Sahaja Savikalpa
Samadhi. Those words of mine alluded to it.
See different groups post at bottom( I just typed it and dont feel
like retyping it)
>difference between a non-dual type and a dual-type.
> 2. I am told you non-dual types believe in nothing.
> Not even that nothing.
> And there is no non-dual types.
> Or to put it in another manner........there is not a whit
>JJM. See post at bottom.
> Do you believe in yourself?JJM. Who read and then answered this post? That is "your"Self as I
> What is this "yourself"?
did not read and answer my post.
> If you only accept your awareness, do you accept mine?JJM. Truth is apparent. So is honesty. Honesty is accepting neither
> There is no "your" or "my" awareness.
duality or oneness as you say. So, honestly, Jason is mine, Sandeep
is yours. I will hang on to Jason for the time being. If your
looking to give away Sandeep, I'll pass.
> If you accept mine, you must accept God. That in which we live,
> and have our being. Qualified non-dualism.dream.
> Aceept whatever rocks.
> Reject whatever rocks
> Both sneezings of the dreamt up character of the last night sleep
JJM. The waking body is just as fleeting as the dream body. Where
is your body in deep sleep, or nirvikalpa samdhi. Could we chat in
the later "states". We are now. What does that tell ya?
> 3. Do you accept qualified non-dualism? Or do you only practice
> dualsim?JJM. Look it up.
> What is qualified non-dualism?
> What is the practice non-dualism?
> If so, do you have sex, enjoy food, etc.?
> Very much.
> And you forgot a good Cohiba.
> Sex is mere humping,.......... while a good cigar..........now
Jason also enjoys the odd joint, the odd cigarrete, mexican and
italian food, and the Holy Mother. Does the none dual state allow of
If a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound? Only if there is
an ear drum around. Other wise it is just vibration.
The difference between tasting sugar, and being sugar.
> The differenceis that difference?
> between tasting sugar and being sugar.
> Being somewhat wet-behind the ears, can you please explain what
JJM. See above.
>Yes, the part of Ramana. He did not talk for many years, in the
> Do you act non-dual(ie
> That dude in the diaper was acting?
early years. I guess he was only doing guest appearnences at the
time. And as for his action after, he compared it to a sleep
walker. He said Jesus the Christ was not aware of his action. Have
you ever driven home and not remebered getting, like sleep walking,
it is just a metaphor to explain sahaja nirvikalpa samadhi. The pure
expression of God.
>Sahaja Nirvikalpa Samadhi.
> or are you a hipocrit and really practice qualified non-
> dualism(ie papaji).
> So non-hypocrisy lies in practicing non-qualified non-dualism?
> Can any "ism" escape a qualification?
> Non-qualification..............is not a qualification?
> Act non-dual as well as talk non-dual.
> How do you act non-dual?
The sadhana of gnani gets you to act right. No parts, no desire.
Kill desire. Etc. No male or female, means no sex. Shitty deal for
some. An ape is attracted to an ape. Different races are attracted
to their own somewhat. Daughter end up with husbands like their
dads. Attraction is a mental creation, enforced by past influences.
If you were non-dual, would you like blondes or brunnettes better?
Bunk question in the non-dual standpoint.
Anyways, If I had posted the below before you posted your response,
which one would you have responded to, and what would have been the
thought and context.
Posted on the "direct approach" group.
Natural abidance in the effulgence of Self, is preceded by un-natural
abidance in the effulgence of Self.
This whole group, Ramana, Sankara, Patanjali, Ramakrishna, etc. etc.,
vedanta, religion, the very chance to experience realization, would
not be without the cause.
So to deny the former, is to deny the present.
Without duality, there would be no whole. Get it.
Thank the dudes that remain un-awakened, as they give the chance for
us to be the polar.
Nirvikalpa samdhi admits of no parts, no body(hence death in most
cases). So it is seen that the natural state would not allow our
little chats. And where would be the fun in that.
This is sahaja savikalpa samadhi we are injoying, or you would not be
Sahaja savikalpa (dual) samadhi or the natural abidance in the
effulgence of Self, is the kingdom of heaven, the kingdom of heaven
is inside you. Enjoy it.
But remember without hell, there is no heaven.
Om Tat Sat.
Ramakrishna was travelling in a cariage to some devotees house, they
passed a bar, with revelors and drunk merry makers. He saw the
revelry of the Holy Mother and went into samadhi. He shouted,
congratulations and happiness for them, as he leaned out of the
carrige and lost outward consciousness. One new devotee became
concerned about the masters body. His concernes were quenched by an
experienced devotee of the Master.
Om Namah Shivaya
Jason James Morgan"
You dont have to accept God, to accept this.