Re: Naked Invitation/Devi II
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Gene Poole"
> >devianandi <no_reply@y...> wrote:devi: it seems to me that you are condeming me.
> >>(in reply to Gene, who said:)
> > >
> > > There you 'go' again, Devi.
> > devi: there she goes...
> > > On what basis do you make such condemnations?
> > devi: personal preference
> Do you prefer to condemn?
> That... is a big 'problem'.
>devi: oh really
> > >
> Strange... because as a reader of this list,
> you already did tell me just that...
and I am
> here to tell you, that I not only disagree withdevi: thats fine
> your judgment/condemnation,
but that I also
> warn you of a potentially fatal flaw in yourdevi: interesting
> handling of yourself... how you gate your own
> energies, in reaction to what you observe, or
> think that you observe...
> > > Something you do not know, but which I will now
> > > tell you: There are no standards.
> > devi: i think your right, but i don't believe you walk the talk,
> > you did, we wouldn't be having this conversationdevi: we are having this conversation becasue you don't walk your
> 'We' are having this conversation, because I care to
> do so... how about you?
talk and i'm just pointing that out to you
>devi: thats ok, *There is No Law* is not anything so profound that i
> > > There Is No Law
> > devi: right back atcha
> I detect lack of understanding of what I said...
need to explore what you mean by it..anymore than what i already
think you mean
>devi: humans were never invented, the idea was is and always will be
> > > All of that is purely human invention;
> > devi: what is not human invention
> What invented humans, is not a human
inherent in what is
>devi: your like the blind man who touches the elephant and thinks he
> > and you
> > > continually reveal yourself to be slave to the
> > > invention of humans.... no different than 'addiction'
> > > to anything else...
> > devi: if i were to ever give you an indepth look into the life of
> > what has been me i imagine that you might have a different view...
> Still, a slave to circumstances... such as the
> emission of condemnations... and on a regular,
> predictable basis, as well...
knows the whole elephant..
>devi: ok gene, your on the stage now...tell us in what sense did you
> > > Do you really think yourself better, than the one
> > > who made you, and gave you sexuality, and
> > > (heaven forbid!) genitals?
> > devi: gene, is that *enlightenement*? ..to think that there is a
> > someone else who made me?
> Not 'someone' in the sense you seem to imply, Devi
imply a *someone*
> > > It is all about choice, Devi... not 'law'.
> > >
> > >
> > > ==Gene Poole==
> > devi: like i quoted in another group today,,,from baba hari
> > are like goats tied to a fence with a long rope...devi: i have at times..it doesn't seem to suit my purposes now
> Can you exist, without the constraint of the rope?
> > so, you want to have a contest...see who can talk about genitals
> > best and the longest?devi:
> That is not the topic here. Elsewhere, it is the topic...
> Meditation on the 'blank screen' of empty awareness itself,devi: i have no resolutions waiting to happen, thats your trip...you
> will resolve for you, the issues we are discussing...
> ==Gene Poole==
meditate on that blank screen of empty awareness, is that orange
chair available for you? what does Neo stand for?