Re: A notion called Time
- --- In email@example.com, Sandeep
>have volume to be detected, hence the needs the construct of "space"
> For something , aka phenomenality, .......to be cognized it must
and further it must be extended in duration, hence needs the
construct of "time".
>phenomenality, is an inference, a notion, an ideation.
> The space-time construct, "born" simultaneously with the "birth" of
>superposition principle is one that is obeyed by all waves in
> Why so?
> Let's take Time.
> And let's approach this construct from the world of Science.
> Quantum Mechanics states...
> When we are dealing with waves, we have a different rule. The
material media provided their amplitudes are not too great, and is
rigorously obeyed by all electromagnetic waves and quantum waves. It
says that the net wave amplitude or height at any point in space is
equal to the algebraic sum of the heights of all of the contributing
>which may or may not result thereof), which "occurs" is the
> What this points to is that any single thought (and the action
culmination of all thoughts ever taken, by any biological computer,
(sentient manifested object) ever since phenomenon apparently came to
>which believes it his or her thought or his or her action.
> Hence is it the "mosaic" which thinks, not the individual entity
>possibilities and "thought" is nothing but a "collapse" of one of the
> Further Science concludes of a wave function with infinite
possibility into a body-mind complex.
>not sequential events in time.
> Ergo, the cause and effect, both are simultaneously existing and
>sentient human conditioned object called 'human", the wired psycho-
> The total picture already IS.
> So why is it that the apparatus of the "biological computer", the
somatic apparatus, has a sense of "time", with a past that happened
before, a present happening now and a future that will happen in time
different to the before and the now?
>only see one frame of that painting.
> Imagine a painting 20 miles high and 20 miles long.
> The total painting already IS, but at any one point of time, we can
>frame, notices the changes, between the two.
> We then move and another frame appears in a radar screen.
> The mnemonic impressions of the past frame, when it views the new
>movement, "becoming", "evolution".......... "change"
> And thus is born
>of the limitation of our vision, the innate "wiring", the intrinsic
> And hence traveling from frame to frame,........... purely because
architecture of the manifest object, ...............a sense of time
>architecture of the design of the biological computer.
> But this sense of time is purely conceptual arising out of the very
>viewing the frames, ........already IS.
> The total painting was always there, .........complete.
> The Total Picture, which includes, the sentient manifested object,
>biological computer, which can only be acausal and non-volitional,
> With "metanoesis" in some rare and appropriately conditioned
and which we popularly call "awakening"
or "enlightenment", .............the limitation is no more, the
previous gestalt is no more, the two contextual constructs of time
and space are no more.
> For a sage or a Master, the whole picture is apperceived
>occurrences in linear sequential time, then what "becoming" is
> Now if cause and effect are not separate in the sense of
>breathing techniques, or whatever, in order that I will become an
> Today I am miserable seeker, and doing the practice of meditation,
>are both simultaneously existing, in the context that the whole
> What becoming is possible , in the context that cause and effect
Picture all ready IS.
>arising out of the very architecture of manifestation.
> The total picture all ready IS.
> And thus is "time" ,........ a notion, an ideation, an inference,
I liked this very much and wanted to add a few things.
The relative effects of karma being described as already written
cannot be confounded with the absolute now in order to make
predestination reasonable. In other words, the Now is the repositry
of every action ever taken and is the complete story. To say that
there is sense that the future is already written is to forget that
the future is an illusion.
I will add a bit of the Uncertainty Principle here and say that
observation alters the events. What I mean is that your description
is very accurate if observed that is, considered, and non existent if
ignored. Leaving only the Now.
Yours in love,