5664Re: Any relevance here? Dan
- Apr 1, 2003--- In email@example.com, "Jeff Belyea" <jeff@s...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "jodyrrr"Right. The difference being seen from here is that Dan doesn't construct
> <jodyrrr@y...> wrote:
> > --- In email@example.com, "Jeff Belyea"
> <jeff@s...> wrote:
> > > It was still Dan's generous description.
> > >
> > > Still enjoying life,
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > Correct. It was Dan's observation that there are those who promote
> > themselves as being beyond identity via the agency of a self-constructed
> > identity termed the "happy meditator," an identity that many of these
> > "happy meditators" either refuse to see or cannot see in themselves.
> Termed by Dan, any way you cut it.
Dan for the sake of potential devotees as the "happy meditators" appear
to do. That is, Dan is Dan and calls it as he sees it, and the "happy
meditators" are various individuals who have wrapped themselves in
the robes of a "happy meditator" expressly for the purpose of making
themselves attractive to potential students.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>