Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

5652Re: Any relevance here? Dan

Expand Messages
  • jodyrrr
    Apr 1, 2003
      --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Belyea" <jeff@s...> wrote:
      > --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, "judirhodes"
      > <judirhodes@z...> wrote:
      > > --- In meditationsocietyofamerica@yahoogroups.com, "G"
      > > <crystalkundalini@h...> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > G: one more additional comment to Jeff's clarity..... you see we
      > > > do not think that we are higher - more special - elite... we Know
      > > > that what we are is most ordinary ... we have gone past all the
      > > > games.... and where we are everyone can be.... behind all of
      > > > the shadows and clouds of ignorance (which parade through
      > > > mental dramas and judgement) , remains the light of Pure
      > > > Being which is everyones birthright.....
      > > >
      > "We" are HAPPY MEDITATORS - Dan's generous description.

      And I think Dan's point is this: to be a "happy meditator" requires
      one to define themselves as such, and as such they provide themselves
      with yet another cage of identity, that of being the "happy meditator."

      So, being a "happy meditator" is just like being a "suffering wannabe"
      or a "perpetual loser" insofar as these are all self-generated definitions
      of individuality rather than the pure being behind it all.

      This isn't to say that a "happy meditator" doesn't have access to
      themselves as this pure being, just that they dress this pure being
      up as the "happy meditator" and parade it around for those they
      consider less happy then themselves.
    • Show all 72 messages in this topic