3254Re: A simple question.
- Feb 3, 2003--- In email@example.com, "dan330033
<dan330033@y...>" <dan330033@y...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, freyjartist@a..."Yes, Michael. And it's because of this.
> > <<Yes. And it is that rare, rare
> > exception (such as Jan B) who
> > is the first to tell us that
> > "apperception" or "enlightenment"
> > is only the first step. Jan B effectively reminds us
> that "apperception" is
> > only
> > the first step. He reminds us that
> > there is a process of deconditioning...
> > kundalini style.....that remains
> > until there are no more 'flip flops'
> > from the 'old' perspective back to
> > the 'new' one.
> > Melody>>
> > hmm..Melody, you must be reading my mind :-)
> > i was just thinking about Jan's perspective on this extremely
> > in relation to "all of this" that we are addressing
> > re: "The Realizers".
> > Freyja
> This stuff is so silly.
> How can there be realizers without nonrealizers,
> and vice versa?
> What a game this realizing stuff turns out to be.
> A thorough waste of time, all the proclamations
> about realizing, realizers, nonrealizers ...
> -- Dan
This must all end. But noooo....there is
this Sicilian thing....."
LOL Dan, you crack me up.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>