3215Re: Daily Practice (who i am)
- Feb 3, 2003--- In email@example.com, freyjartist@a...
> ****** Personal attachment and involvement are a problem for you,not
> for me.>>that
> Ah but, listen closely. The personal attachment and involvement
> you perceive in me (however you are doing that) IS actuallyperceived
> by you as a problem....and thus, it is the same thing.******* Your problem is not my problem unless I make it so.
> The fully realized would not perceive it as a "problem".
> There is a snafu.
That's why I tend to stay away from people with "problems".
They're a drag to be around. If it's not one thing, it's another,
trouble, trouble, trouble, never really happy, bitch, bitch, bitch,
whine, whine, whine. I need, I need, I need. Sheesh! Please move
your foot out of the way so I can close the door. :-) And yes to a
realizer it's not REALLY a problem, cause he sees it's all in your
head! Your're creating your shit yourself.
> <<That's the difference. None of that bothers me in the least.pain,
> That's because you're still in the business of trying to avoid
> I am not. Tears come and go. It's the "richness" of being human.me. We
> The realzier is the "lamb of god" in other words. He is not in the
> business of avoiding.
> You are not totally on target with this call. I let my pain in,
> as well as my joy. The nice thing for me is that you, Judi, cannot
> rock the apperception that i have had thus far, and can only
> add to my refinement and strengthen this understanding by testing
> are all lambs of God.
> I also feel that teaching what you are teaching is not an easy
> business, and could stand to take to heart some of what Jeff
> wrote in post #3193.
- << Previous post in topic